3

Will new Iranian sanctions be effective?

Iranian Ambassador to the U.N. Mohammad Khazaee speaks after a vote on broader military and financial sanctions on Iran over its suspect nuclear program during a U.N. Security Council at the U.N. headquarters in New York.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Today, for the fourth time since 2006, the United Nations Security Council voted for economic sanctions against Iran. The council's expressing its displeasure with Tehran's nuclear program. Some Iranian banks and companies tied to that program are going to face new restrictions. But the first three rounds of sanctions didn't do anything to convince Iran nuclear power's not in their self-interest. So what are the odds this one will?


By Brett Neely

Today's Security Council resolution expands an international arms embargo against Iran. More Iranian banks and companies involved with the nuclear weapons program will be added to a U.N. blacklist and won't be able to trade abroad.

"It makes it a little bit more difficult for Iran to do business as usual," said Jacqueline Shire, a former U.S. diplomat and a U.N. weapons inspector who's now at the Center for Science and International Security.

But today's new sanctions don't touch Iran's oil industry, its biggest source of revenue. That decision faced up to a political reality, says Shire.

"China wanted assurances that nothing in this resolution would really change the way Iran does its daily non-nuclear-related business," she said.

The sanctions are designed to increase the pressure on Iran, says George Lopez, who is a sanctions expert at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

"You know it's not a total lockdown, let's not fool ourselves here," Lopez said. "But it does have a ripple effect that changes that the way the leaders in Tehran will think about the costs of continuing to pursue this nuclear program."

But three earlier rounds of U.N. sanctions haven't stopped the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Karim Sadjadpour, an associate at the Carnegie Endowment, says Iran has plenty of oil to export and an economy that's already been isolated for decades.

"Further sanctioning Iran is kind of like sentencing a recluse to house arrest," Sadjadpour said.

Meanwhile, the European Union plans to introduce even tighter sanctions of its own as early as next week.

bob builder's picture
bob builder - May 2, 2011

In early January 2011, the departing chief of Israel’s intelligence agency said that Iran would not be able to produce a nuclear weapon before 2015 because of “measures that have been deployed against them.”

Larry McGovern's picture
Larry McGovern - Jun 10, 2010

Brett Neely's otherwise fine piece has one glaring fault. He states that prior sanctions "have not stopped the Iranian nuclear weapons program", leaving the distinct impression that such a nuclear weapons program continues to exist. This flies in the face of the 2007 unanimous conclusion of ALL 16 U.S. intelligence agencies that the nuclear weapons program ceased in 2003. There has been nothing since then to change this conclusion. In fact, there are weapons inspectors in Iran right now who have yet to find a restart of the nuclear weapons program. Please be very careful of your facts in the future.

David Rigby's picture
David Rigby - Jun 10, 2010

Here's an idea: perhaps Marketplace can do an analysis of whether any economic sanctions have accomplished their purpose. Ever.