3
Taking on teacher tenure
Students study with their laptop computers.
To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.
Kai Ryssdal: There's a reason the Chicago teachers strike got so much press.
It's because (in part, anyway) the strike was about a whole lot more than just Chicago... or Chicago teachers. It was about how to fix really troubled schools, about how long a school day should be and about how to evaluate good teachers and keep them -- and not keep the ones who aren't so good.
In Chicago, tenure protections survived the new contract. But around the country states are trying to make it easier to fire ineffective teachers.
Which gets us to this: what is tenure at the K - 12 level anyway? And why do teachers have it?
From the Marketplace Education Desk at WYPR, Amy Scott reports.
Jeff Mirel taught junior high in a Cleveland suburb in the 70's. After three years on the job, he showed up at the school board meeting to hear his name ring out among the newly-tenured teachers. The union president laughed at him.
Jeff Mirel: And he said, “What do you think tenure is?” And I said, “Well, I have job security for the rest of my life." And he said, "No. What tenure does is it guarantees you have an orderly dismissal.”
That is, Mirel couldn’t be fired without a reason -- and a hearing. Now, he has the “lifetime guarantee” kind of tenure as a professor of educational studies at the University of Michigan. He says first grade teachers have tenure for the same reason academics do. It started in the early 1900's to protect teachers from being fired to make room for the superintendent’s nephew. Or, say, for teaching evolution in biology class.
Mirel: You know, it gave teachers some job security in a world in which political allegiances mattered more than what you knew how to teach and your ability to teach it.
But those protections have made it hard -- and expensive -- to fire ineffective teachers. Sandi Jacobs is Vice President of the National Council on Teacher Quality. She says it can cost $200,000 in legal fees to fire one teacher. Often, she says, school bosses don’t bother.
Jacobs: That’s why we hear tenure so frequently equated with lifetime employment. That’s not technically what it means, but that’s become the reality in a lot of places.
Jacobs says several states have passed or are working on laws to make tenure tougher to get, and easier to lose. Former teacher Robb Cooper is now a lawyer in Chicago. He’s helped districts get rid of dozens of ineffective teachers.
Cooper: You do it precisely, do it carefully, make certain that teacher's rights are regarded. It’s not a difficult process.
Cooper says weak teachers show their weaknesses early, and the best way to avoid expensive battles is not to give them tenure in the first place.
I’m Amy Scott for Marketplace.
Microsoft's Social networking Principles quiz is actually new common throughout precessing on-line. The quiz possesses gotten an easy wedding reception worldwide at high-profiled businesses.
http://www.dumpsnow.com/dumps/VCP-410.php
In another generation or so, they may study the history of the strange old days when thousands of people would ride buses to a big building every day to study together. There is a lot more wrong than just bad teachers, but all the teachers should be responsible for how well they do the job, the same as the rest of us. Wherever you go, people might be fired for little reason, and if they are good, they will survive. Tenure for teachers is a nice idea but it contributes to the failure of the schools, and we need schools that don't fail. The main thing we can do right now is improve the software for computers, so each student can have an individual tutor. Some may say that we will never be able to teach all students that way, but we can keep trying to do better. In our high tech world, nobody can learn more than a small fraction of the totality of human knowledge; we can't afford to take years to learn ordinary arithmetic, if there is a way to do it faster and let the student go on to learn something else. And, at each stage, if the computer can teach some subjects for some of the students, that will let the teacher have more time for those who need help from a human. The public schools are relying on their monopoly status, with students required by law to attend school, to avoid the hard work of improvement. There was plenty of evidence of that in Chicago.
If one teacher is bad, that's a problem with the teacher.
If more than one teacher seems to be bad, that's a problem with the ADMINISTRATION -- either they're hiring the wrong people or (more likely) they're misdirecting the teachers or (still more likely?) their criteria are broken.
Blaming the teachers is the wrong way to go. Fix the administration.
