11
FedEx and UPS spar over union rights
A FedEx truck is parked between two UPS trucks.
To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.
TEXT OF STORY
Kai Ryssdal: Wall Street analysts usually look to FedEx and UPS as a sign of economic things to come. If they're moving more packages that's seen as a promising sign. Now, though, labor specialists are paying attention to a disagreement between this country's two biggest delivery services. And this question: Is FedEx an airline or a trucker? Marketplace's Dan Grech has more.
DAN GRECH: Congress is considering a change to labor law that would make it easier for FedEx Express drivers to unionize. FedEx currently is treated as an airline company, which is governed by the Railway Labor Act. Its industry rivals are treated as trucking companies governed by the National Labor Relations Act.
The new legislation would treat FedEx Express like a trucker. Ken Hall is a vice president at the Teamsters trucking union, which stands to gain new members from the change.
KEN HALL: We think it provides for a level playing field.
Rules on unionization are tougher in the airline industry, since local strikes can paralyze the national transportation system. Hall says that means FedEx drivers have historically had a harder time collective bargaining, as compared to UPS drivers.
HALL: UPS employees' hourly wage rates are significantly higher, plus their health-insurance benefits are better and cost them less.
FedEx has said its wages and benefits are competitive with those of UPS.
And a FedEx spokesman said that 85 percent of FedEx Express shipments are delivered by air, while 85 percent of UPS packages are by truck. FedEx says the legislation would tip the scales in favor of its arch rival.
Earlier this month, FedEx started a Web site called Brown Bailout. The site includes a video parody that features a UPS employee searching Capitol Hill for the bailout office.
The dispute has created strange bedfellows. Siding with the Teamsters in backing the proposed legislation is a collection of conservative groups including the Frontiers of Freedom. George Landrith is the nonprofit group's president. He says the legislation appeals to some conservatives because it will encourage fair competition in the transportation industry.
GEORGE LANDRITH: So now the question is will the law correct the accident of history and treat them the same. Or will it decide to treat one unfavorably and one favorably?
Landrith says he can think of few occasions over the past two decades that he's agreed with the Teamsters on anything.
I'm Dan Grech for Marketplace.
Pages
If things are so bad at Fed Ex, why aren't the employees making a racket? I have been following this debacle and I think that one company shouldn't force another company to submit or commit to anything. A lot of people stand to make money out of this....who's thinking of the employees?...Ohh the last I heard UPS drivers were making $29.00/hr...and even non-drivers are making $17.00/hr...
For those that think the temesters are the savor, you should ask some of your ups drivers what happened to there retirement that the temesters spent and ups had to replace. the ones that want the teamters are the ones that want something for nothing just do your job.
It is impossible for fedex employees to unionize or ask for union representation as someone has asked about previously in this post. Under the Railway Act it is very difficult for employees to organize for a union vote or to be protect from retaliation from their employer. That is why fedex is fighting so hard to retain status as an airline. The are the only delivery/pickup company that is classified as such. This is strictly to keep their employees from having the right to organize a union.
This whole issue about the teamsters and FedEx is about money. The teamsters see FedEx as a major money source and they want a piece of the action. My prediction is they will never get into fedex because their employees are overall very happy.
Perhaps the Teamsters/Frontiers of Freedom partnership is not so unusual after all - FedEx refused to pay off the conservative think tank ACU (http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/07/17/Report-ACU-offered-endorsement-fo...), so they went with UPS. See also http://volokh.com/posts/1247839717.shtml
I would like to know why Dan Grech did not ask UPS why they do not request to be classified under the Railroad Labor Act or if things are so bad at FedEx, why aren't the employees asking for the union representation? I think that an unbiased and common sense view would have included these point of view. It is clear that the Teamsters has millions to gain from union dues, why doesn't the world see this?
Pages
