14

A surprise viral hit: Income inequality, the movie

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

You may have seen this video recently, about wealth inequality.

It's gone viral over the last week or so, which isn’t news in itself, of course. Stuff goes viral all the time. But usually it’s cute kids dressed as turtles, strange and hilarious music videos and music video spoofs.

But wealth inequality? Not the sexiest of subjects.

It's not a flashy video. It is a little over six minutes long.  It has moody music.  It has a voiceover from a guy with a slight southern twang. It has lots of charts showing how Americans think wealth is distributed, compared to how it actually is.

So why does this video suddenly have more than 3 million hits?

I decided to work backwards and follow the viral chain. I first saw the video thanks to my boyfriend, who’d seen it through a post his friend, Brent, put on his Facebook page. I called up Brent, and he told me he found the video on Facebook too, and has no idea who made it. His best guess was “some guy in his bedroom who said, 'You know, people need to know about this. I’m just going to make a little animation here.'”

Brent’s theory is basically right. Someone by the name of "politizane" posted the video back in November on YouTube. A reporter from the magazine Mother Jones tracked politizane down a few days ago. He said he wanted to stay anonymous, but described himself as a freelance designer, “from a red state,” who'd been struck by a wealth inequality study he’d read about, conducted by two professors.

Duke Marketing professor Dan Ariely happens to be one of those professors. “I think what made it big,” Ariely says of the video, “was that one of the actors from Star Trek put it on his Facebook.”

That actor, George Takei, who played Sulu on "Star Trek," told me he posted the video right after the sequester kicked into gear, because he'd been thinking a lot about how the across the board budget cuts might affect an already shrinking middle class.

 “I thought that video captured it so visually, so powerfully,” Takei told me. Takei happens to have 3.6 million followers on Facebook, meaning he’s a sort of "super connector” who all by himself can help a video go viral. But it turns out that Takei also found the video through Facebook, in a post that a friend linked to from mashable.com.

Websites like Mashable and Upworthy, which also posted the video in the last few days, make a lot of money embedding videos they think will go viral, says Maksim Tsvetovat, a professor of computer science who researches social networks at George Mason University. These sites will either sell ads next to them, or sell data on who clicked on what posts. “That data itself is priceless,” explains Tsvestovat. “Marketers will pay a lot to know what are people’s interests, how information spreads on a specific topic, and how fast.”

To those who see irony in a video about wealth inequality generating serious revenue for private businesses, Tsvetovat points out "it's in the nature of capitalism to exploit anything that looks like an opportunity.” Even when that opportunity is a viral video highlighting the impact of unfettered capitalism.

About the author

Krissy Clark is the senior reporter for Marketplace’s Wealth & Poverty Desk.

Pages

Nan's picture
Nan - Mar 27, 2013

Really?
If a designer decides to send an important message to the public with his work and you choose to focus on its "viral" qualities rather than the message, you've done the artist, economics professors and the entire country a disservice. The skill shown this dedicated person (coming from an art and design educator) was the restraint to simplify and elegantly, present a message. He was not tempted to make the project overly emotional or flashy. Keep it simple, understandable. In addition, this was your chance to boost its effectiveness by launching many shows or segments building on the topic, underscoring its importance. We’re interested, listening and ready to...

dmulliga's picture
dmulliga - Mar 18, 2013

I love it!

This is absolutely the best example I have seen in a long time of how to lie using statistics! They used every one of the classic marketing ploys; including the one I always think people will be to smart to buy: where you adjust the axis of your graph to make it too small to hold the data (and people say "Oh my god"). And the really wonderful thing about videos is you can add that really morbid spooky music in the background to play on the subconscious.

Jonathan Vaage's picture
Jonathan Vaage - Mar 12, 2013

Another problem with looking at wealth (or "net worth") is that a person's place on the spectrum can vary drastically throughout their lifetime. Someone just starting out can have more student loans than assets and have a negative "net worth" but by the time they reach the height of their productive career, could end up squarely in the top 20%...This analysis looks at the whole population at various stages in their lives and I'm sure if lifetime earnings was being observed, then the disparity would be less dramatic. My guess is that it's just the nature of a very large global marketplace that there are a small number of people who are very good at generating value for millions/billions of people who are willing to pay them for it. Of course, you'll have those who inherit wealth, but those fortunes tend to get diluted over time if they're not protected from free competition by corrupt governments.

learningengineer's picture
learningengineer - Mar 12, 2013

Your guess? I think people would prefer facts and evidence to guesses. Sadly for your theory the rich are rich throughout their lives.

IVAMU is SOLUTION's picture
IVAMU is SOLUTION - Mar 11, 2013

+++
All the Cause of this collapse, poverty, misery can be pinpointed to just ONE Privately run and owned company known as the (non)Federal AND (no)Reserve.

They are the elephant in the livingroom, the bull in a china shop, but it seems to also get far less attention and focus then a hundred mice in the same environments all at the same tme.

They need to be shut down, the sooner the better.

We do not need them. we do not want them.
They are in an intrinsic violation of the US Constitution.
Their very existence is in violation of the US Constitutional money clauses.

We the people have finally had enough.

Ask your US Reps to begin making the move to shut them down now.

Ask the Military to round them up, not us.

Visit and get to know the Real World Solution located here:
http://www.ivamu.com/ivamupressrelease.htm
###

learningengineer's picture
learningengineer - Mar 12, 2013

You are deluded to say the least. Before it was the Reserve it was the Bank of the United States and we had plenty of asset bubbles when we didn't have a Reserve or Bank. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

IVAMU is SOLUTION's picture
IVAMU is SOLUTION - Mar 11, 2013
IVAMU is SOLUTION's picture
IVAMU is SOLUTION - Mar 11, 2013
jingoistic's picture
jingoistic - Mar 11, 2013

what bothers me about this coverage on this topic is the angle - "where did it come from?"

really? that's the most striking thing about this video? especially for a show like marketplace? you guys should be all over this in terms of analysis and commentary but the only thing you have to say about it is "where did it come from?"...

bugged the hell out of me when i heard this take on friday. bugs the hell out of me seeing it repeated in my inbox.

do better.

Scott6113's picture
Scott6113 - Mar 11, 2013

The video, shocking as it is, does not extrapolate to the future. What will happen if these trends are not unchecked? France 1776 and Russia 1905 provide clues. The top 1% in the US are not entrepreneurs, are not benefactors and are not job creators. They are untitled royalty with apparent government as their puppet. In good times, they claim to be libertarians. In bad times, they raid the US treasury for bailouts. They control the information flow. Most of what you know is exactly what they want you to know. Shortly the underclass, the 47% Romney derided will have nothing left to lose and civil unrest will ensue. Occupy Wall Street is just the beginning.

Pages