4

U.S. moves green patents to fast lane

A $100 bill inside a light bulb represents a green business idea

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: It wasn't all small business in the president's speech. He also said he wants to spend more on infrastructure to get the economy going. And he wants to invest in green technology. To that end the patent office announced today it's going to put green patents at the front of the line. A very long line of waiting patent applications. Marketplace's Nancy Marshall Genzer explains.


Nancy Marshall Genzer: It takes a long time to get a patent approved by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Sometimes more than three years. So inventors perk up when they get a chance to cut in line. The fast-tracking applies only to inventors who've already filed their patent applications. They'll have to apply for special status, explaining how their inventions help the environment. The patent office is bracing for a green wave.

AARON McGushion: It's sort of like trying to fill a teacup with a fire hose. There's, I would guess, many tens of thousand of applications.

That's Aaron McGushion, an inventor who teaches physics at Santa Monica College. The patent office will take only the first 3,000 inventors who apply for green status. McGushion says those slots will go fast. Maybe to companies like GE, with a lot of patent applications on file.

MCGUSHION: So imagine they have 500 applications pending right now. I would imagine that they'd want to put all of them in this program in order to get their patents issued very quickly.

And, in the rush, the meaning of what's green could be stretched. The applications have to fit into almost 80 categories. But they're pretty broad.

Arti Rai is an administrator at the patent office.

ARTI RAI: Alternative energy production, and all the mechanisms for alternative energy one could think of, all the mechanisms for energy conservation one could think of.

Rai says patent examiners will sift through those first 3,000 applications. She's hoping they can shave months, if not years off the patent review process.

In Washington, I'm Nancy Marshall Genzer for Marketplace.

About the author

Nancy Marshall-Genzer is a senior reporter for Marketplace based in Washington, D.C. covering daily news.
sol azul's picture
sol azul - Dec 16, 2009

Oh man, at first I thought it would take 3 maybe 6 months to at least get a reply - or if I'm lucky and did my job done right, get it granted. Either case I'm a beginning inventor and student studying electrical engineering and have cool ideas for games (not video games) so that kids and even adolescents as well as adults can go outside in the sun and play. But geesh, well will my dreams come true? 3 years? 6? I'm sad but not deterred. Well fine if they want green technology, I'll give them that. I'll just work in parallel with my games, "green technology" and studies to make something. I'll figure something out. I'm determined. And I'm young ;)

William Daviau's picture
William Daviau - Dec 9, 2009

As I represent a firm with several patent aplications relating to Green Technology before the Patent Office, I want to say it is more important that the examiner be thorough than that he be fast. Our technology is featured at
http://www.rboxllc.com/

Anthony Smith's picture
Anthony Smith - Dec 9, 2009

Three years? It can take up to three years to get a patent approved? Now there is a jobs program for you. There should be no reason a patent should take more than six months to get approved. The Patent Office should either improve its management systems or hire more examiners so most patents are approved in six months or less, and not just green patents. Think about how many new innovations are languishing in the Patent Office that might be making significant improvements in our lives if only the Patent Office were more efficient.

Amy Kean's picture
Amy Kean - Dec 8, 2009

While the text on this site indicates the full name of the Office was used in the report, on the radio the reporter consistently referred to the US Patent & Trademark Office as the "Patent Office."

There is another part of the Office and for the record, there is not a three year backlog for Trademark filings. But according to this reporter there is no "T" in the USPTO...