1

Wikileaks publishes 251,000 unredacted State Department documents

We've been talking about this story for a while. How Wikileaks founder Julian Assange entrusted someone with access to the group's stash of US State Department cables, many of which had the names of current employees. These are names of people who could be in danger if their names were to get out. These were cables that Assange wasn't going to share, at least not before redacting. But the guy he gave access to did publish them and now Assange has published all the cables himself, no names redacted, it's all out there.

From The Guardian:

The move has been strongly condemned by the five previous media partners - the Guardian, New York Times, El Pais, Der Spiegel and Le Monde - who have worked with WikiLeaks publishing carefully selected and redacted documents.
"We deplore the decision of WikiLeaks to publish the unredacted state department cables, which may put sources at risk," the organisations said in a joint statement.
"Our previous dealings with WikiLeaks were on the clear basis that we would only publish cables which had been subjected to a thorough joint editing and clearance process. We will continue to defend our previous collaborative publishing endeavour. We cannot defend the needless publication of the complete data - indeed, we are united in condemning it.

About the author

John Moe is the host of Marketplace Tech Report, where he provides an insightful overview of the latest tech news.
Log in to post1 Comment

Frontline did a nice piece on Assange. The guy strikes me as incredibly arrogant. I understand both sides, I appreciate government's requirement to have secrecy- the private sector needs this, individuals need this. I also understand the need to illegal actions to be identified and prosecuted, even if those actions are "secret". I think my objection to Wiki is that it's simply a data dump, without any consideration for the matters involved.

With Generous Support From...