7

The possibility of an Internet shutdown in the U.S.

An ethernet cable

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

Bob Moon: As we reported up top, the political tension in Egypt continues to escalate. Beyond a rush on cash and food staples, most of the country's Internet access has been cut off, although the government has apparently kept vital links open
to the country's stock market. There's word that most people there are turning instead to good old-fashioned dial-up access.

But it got us wondering: How easy is it to just switch off the net? Andrew Blum is a tech writer for Wired magazine. And he's currently writing a book on the infrastructure of the web. Welcome.

Andrew Blum: Thank you.

Moon: So how did it happen that a good percentage of the Internet connections in Egypt got shut down?

Blum: Well as near as anybody can tell, and this is mostly from the intelligence of a company called Renesys, right after midnight on Friday morning Egypt time, it looks as if somebody started making phone calls to the five major Internet service providers in Egypt. And one after another, their routes, their sort of signposts, to their users disappeared from the global Internet.

Moon: So could this kind of shutdown happen here in the U.S.?

Blum: It seems almost impossible to conceive. Partly just based on sheer size. We don't have five ISPs; we have hundreds, if not thousands. And then of course, even the largest like Verizon or Comcast would themselves have sort of dozens if not hundreds if not thousands of different network head-ins. And you'd essentially have to dismantle each of those individually.

Moon: So I heard that the Internet is sort of self-healing. But are there certain choke points that it would be vulnerable?

Blum: The flip side of that is for a smaller, mid-size network, there's what's called the network head-in. There's the place that the rest of the its Internet flows from. And for a small network, it would be quite straightforward to literally pull the plug, pull the yellow fiber optic plug that connects their edge router, as it's called, a sort of washing machine-sized Cisco router usually, to the rest of the Internet. And if that happens, then all of their customers would then be offline.

Moon: Let's explore that a little bit more. You visited a data center, a choke point if you will, in southeastern Wisconsin. Describe for us what that looks like and how service providers connect to consumers actually.

Blum: That's a building in downtown Milwaukee, that's just a regular office building that's been colonized by different Internet companies. The one that I visited serves about 15,000 customers in southeastern Wisconsin, and they have one of these routers with notably two fiber optic cables leading it. One goes to Time Warner, in another suite inside the building. Another goes to Cogent, an Internet backbone company, also inside the building. And from there, they serve their 15,000 customers.

Moon: Now I understand that when we're speaking globally that a lot of our communications to Asia, for example, route through a single building here in Los Angeles? Can that sort of choke point really cause problems?

Blum: That's LAX. That's the LAX equivalent of the Internet. You know, if LAX shut down, it's not as if all air travel would stop, but it would be a huge mess. The same is certainly true for One Wilshire, this very well-known building in downtown Los Angeles. That said, though, we're looking tomorrow at another storm here in New York, and the airports are going to be shut down again, and life goes on and business goes on.

Moon: So let me pin you down: is the Internet here to stay -- are we always going to have the Internet, or is it possible that one day, somebody could decide to shut it down here in the U.S.?

Blum: The basic idea of the Internet is that it's a network of networks. And each of those networks is independently operated. And because of that, you have a lot of versatility and a lot of security because it's sort of inherently public. It has to sort of follow certain protocols if it wants to communicate with other networks. It's easy to imagine the Internet fragmenting in certain ways, but the basic concept of a network of networks disappearing seems hard to fathom.

Moon: Andrew Blum is a tech writer at Wired magazine. Thanks for joining us.

Blum: You're welcome.

Lorne WHITE's picture
Lorne WHITE - Feb 2, 2011

to Bill B from NC:

Good question about "the Great Firewall of China".

But can anyone explain how -and WHY- we also have "the Great Firewall of the USA"? This stops people from OUTSIDE the USA from viewing most video on American websites. PBS prevents Canadians from watching NOVA & other online video that Americans can watch. FOX won't let us watch Fringe, etc. ABC won't let us watch the Daily Show online. ("Sorry, this item is not available/viewable in your region.")

If the Internet and PBS (a publicy-funded broadcaster!)is already restricting information, where Will this lead? Even worse, Canadians provide 75% of WNED's member-support in Buffalo and we aren't given the same access as Americans!

What gives? Will someone tell US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to either stop being a hypocrite with China, or PLEASE restore Freedom to the internet!

Greg C's picture
Greg C - Feb 1, 2011

This story is incomplete without John Gilmore's quote: "The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."

Ian Dakar's picture
Ian Dakar - Feb 1, 2011

I'm not sure taking down DNS would be enough to let the US do what Egypt did. Firstly, is DNS a true chokepoint or does it face the same situation as the head-ins? Remember it's not "Shut down YOUR internet", it's shut down THE internet. Even if it was a true chokepoint, what would be the point? Remember that Egypt didn't shut down the net because someone defrended them: they are trying to stop organized protesters who are using the net to set up their plans. The point? If the US wanted to kill the net, it wouldn't be for Mr. Facebook User. It would be for organized protestors. If they are determined and organized enough to not be stopped by a few military raids how would DNS actually slow them down? It wouldn't even stop them from looking up facebook. And that's AFTER the US spends all that time getting each company to shut down their DNS servers. And that's assuming the protesters don't just use the mass of smaller dial-ups, utilize their cell phone services, ext ext. Bah, if you just want to hurt the masses and don't care about the reason, you're MUCH better off just going for Electricity or food production. It's literally easier to just get the 5 major food makers to stop producing and starve everyone than to stop the internet. Last point: why is it that, to many, the government is "so inept and incapable of anything" yet the same government is suddenly efficient and powerful enough to pull stunts like this? Governments that can do this are MUCH more efficient and capable of rolling out plans than ours is... ...which is sort of why the US government was made so brokenly in the first place.

Bill B's picture
Bill B - Jan 31, 2011

It's awfully strange that the Great Firewall of China wasn't mentioned in this story. That has to be a very well-controlled choke point.

Also, there was a story some time ago (six months? a year?) about China broadcasting routing table updates that resulted in a large part of the global Internet traffic being routed through China. Seems like they (or anyone else) could do that again and then just stop forwarding the packets.

M Vizcaino's picture
M Vizcaino - Jan 31, 2011

Could not agree more with Marc W.
No DNS, no Internet ( for the masses).
DNS stands for Domain Name System. The DNS is a record, located at the register ( ISP), that converts IP addresses from numbers into names, i.e. 123.456.789.0 to www.yourdomain.com. This record tells a browser where your web site is located and also tells mail servers where to route your mail to. If the DNS isn't set-up properly your domain name won't work.

Marc W's picture
Marc W - Jan 31, 2011

Internet could be dismantled for the masses by killing DNS servers. Very well understood that this is how you break it.

DNS translates human readable network locations (yoursite.com) to IPv4/6+stuff (###.###.###.### in ipv4 and stuff = headers).

No DNS, no internet (for the masses).

Look into "darknet" - private DNS distribution networks would not/can not be taken down easilly.

Jim G's picture
Jim G - Jan 31, 2011

You can count on it happening here under the right (or wrong) circumstances. If you don't believe it can't also happen here than you still believe in the tooth fairy.