38

Freakonomics: Saving the environment, or just showing off?

A cameraman takes video of the new 'Prius a' (alpha) minivan-style hybrid vehicles by Japan's auto maker Toyota Motor in Tokyo on May 13, 2011.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Kai Ryssdal: It's time for a little bit of Freakonomics Radio, that moment every couple of weeks where we talk to Stephen Dubner, co-author of the books and blog of the same name, it is the hidden side of everything. Dubner, welcome back.

Stephen Dubner: Thanks Kai. You know, I've got a burning question. I was wondering, what kind of car do you drive?

Ryssdal: OK, one: why? But two: I have four kids, man -- I drive a minivan.

Dubner: And what do you think that minivan says about you, Kai Ryssdal the man?

Ryssdal: It says I'm unbelievably lame, that's what it says. I'm not how I used to be.

Dubner: I would argue to counter that. Let me say this: The fact is that we drive what we drive in some part to tell the world who we are. Some people may want to show that they've got a lot of money. Some people want to show they care a lot about the environment. Or in your case, that you're a good family man.

Ryssdal: And proud of it, but go ahead.

Dubner: A lame family man, but proud about it. And now, there are other ways to signal the world who you are, obviously, not just a car. I want you to listen to Tim Harford, who's an economist and author from London.

Tim Harford: The British Prime Minister, David Cameron, when he was leader of the opposition -- he was trying to get elected -- he wanted to convince people that he was a soft, caring guy and he installed a little windmill on his house. Now, it turns out wind power can be pretty effective. But you need a really, really big windmill in a really windy location to be efficient.

Ryssdal: Sounds a little bit like politics over power generation, right? Because you're not getting a lot of wattage out of that little thing?

Dubner: Not a lot of wattage, but he did get elected, right? Whether the windmill was responsible, it's impossible to say. But if nothing else, Cameron showed off some behavior here that you have to call "conspicuous." And economists love conspicuous behavior. You go back to Thorstein Veblen a century ago, who coined the phrase "conspicuous consumption," which we all know means that you spend money in order to show off your wealth, right? Cameron, though, was spending money to show off something else -- he wanted to show off his environmental bonafides. Now, economists have a name for this, too, which is "conspicuous conservation."

Here's how a young economics researcher at Berkeley named Steve Sexton describes it.

Steve Sexton: A sort of "Keeping Up with the Joneses"-type concept but applied to efforts to make society better. I will be competing with my neighbors to donate to a charity, for instance, or to reduce energy conservation or environmental impacts.

Ryssdal: We've all seen these people, right? They're the compact florescent light bulb folks, they are the bring your own bag into the grocery store -- all stuff trying to save the planet.

Dubner: That's right. Now the economist Steve Sexton, I have to say, has a twin sister whose name is Alison, who's also a young economist. Now these young twin Sexton economists just did a very interesting study where they looked at who buys a hybrid Toyota Prius, and why.

Ryssdal: Out here, by the way, everybody buys them. And even Toyota says they've just sold their millionth, right?

Dubner: Right. The Prius is the king of the hybrids. Now it's not necessarily because it's better than other hybrids; according to the Sextons, it's because the Prius has this unique shape which screams "hybrid," which screams "I love the earth more than you love the earth." Now, if you live in a community that cares a lot about the environment -- somewhere like Boulder, Colo. -- that's worth something.

Here's Alison Sexton.

Alison Sexton: The Prius market share increased disproportionately in greener communities relative to other hybrid cars.

Dubner: So there's your "conspicuous conservation" effect. And the Sextons estimate that buying a Prius can be worth a few thousand dollars to people in terms of their green self-image, and new friends, even better job opportunities, depending on where they live.

Ryssdal: I say this at no risk to my own job opportunity here, Dubner, because many people at Marketplace, well a couple anyway, have Priuses. But could it be, is what I'm hearing you saying, that driving a Prius is all about making yourself look good rather than actually saving the planet?

Dubner: Well it could be. You can't climb inside people's minds. But you can see what they do, and what people do is often a little on the silly side when it comes to conservation, including putting solar panels on the front of your house to show the neighbors, even if that's the shady side of your house; it's not going to generate a lot of power. But people do that. Now this Friday is Earth Day, Kai, and I'm guessing if you look around, you'll see all kinds of conspicuous conservation happening. Which on the one hand you could say, it's nice that people care. On the other hand, the problem is that can crowd out more worthwhile conservation ideas, things like just putting better insulation in your house. But it's hard to show off the insulation to your neighbors, not very sexy.

Ryssdal: Yeah, no, nothing sexy about that. You on the other hand, well, that's another conversation. Stephen Dubner, our Freakonomics Radio correspondent. FreakonomicsRadio.com is the website. Dubner, we'll see you in a couple of weeks.

Dubner: Thanks for having me, Kai.

Pages

Janet Bassett's picture
Janet Bassett - Apr 19, 2011

I listened to this as I drove home from work in my Prius. I am not sure who these people talked to. We needed a new car a couple of years ago because our hand-me-down Oldsmobile was on its last legs. Why a Prius? It's comfortable for tall people and had a proven record of great MPG. We're frugal, that's all there is to it. I guess that would make for a pretty uninteresting story, though ;-)

Patrick Cavanaugh's picture
Patrick Cavanaugh - Apr 19, 2011

As for solar on the front of the house in the shade. You would be pretty crazy to do that with the high cost of going solar. The front of my house faces south, so I plan on putting solar there---in fact my high PG&E bills will be slashed when I do it.

Peter Cadmus's picture
Peter Cadmus - Apr 19, 2011

As both a social scientist and a HARD scientist I have to remind my economist bothers and sisters: "Correlation is not causation" You need more than observational studies to imply what you are implying.

Yohance Edwards's picture
Yohance Edwards - Apr 19, 2011

I don't own a Prius or any other hybrid so I have no skin in the game. But, I found the claim in this piece that people buy Prius's rather than other Hybrids to show off their green cred completely perplexing. What's the basis for this statement in the piece? Everything I've ever read indicates that the Prius is more fuel efficient than any other hybrid. In fact, I thought the reason the Prius looks the way it does is to help it get better gas milage. The fact that the hybrid with the best gas mileage has a "disproportionately" high market share in the greenest communities is exactly what I'd think one would expect. Maybe I'm missing something, but the subtext of your piece seemed to be "if these people were really concerned about the environment, they'd buy lower mile per gallon but ordinary looking Civic Hybrids rather than high mile per gallon environmental chic looking Priuses." Really? I always thought true environmentalists would look for the most efficient/non-polluting car regardless of how it looked. The only Freakonomics here, seems to be the logic of your segment. I've come to expect better from marketplace.

Rob Meyer's picture
Rob Meyer - Apr 19, 2011

I listened with interest to the piece on conspicuous conservation. Well done. First a comment: how did you miss the opportunity to mention that Cameron's political who criticised his wind generator were just "tilting at windmills"? And a question: what would Dubner have to say about rental car companies offering to sell you carbon offset credits with your rental?

Bob Larson's picture
Bob Larson - Apr 19, 2011

I take exception with the notion that people who buy a prius are conspicuous conservationists. A review of 2011 hybrids has the Prius at the top of the list when it comes to millage rating at 51 mpg in the city, 8 mpg better than the Luxus CT200h, which is in the number 2 spot. Additionally, the Priusis also is in the top position when comparing the carbon footprints, which is 3.8 tpy as compared again to the Lexus at 4.5 tpy. This is according to the web site "fueleconomy.gov". You don't believe that a lot of people are just doing their research and coming to the conclusion that buying a Prius is indeed good for the environment. By the way I do not have a Prius. I have a 1999 Honda CRV, but will consider buying one the next time I buy a new car. My Honda only has 140,000 miles on it.

Carlos DeMarchena's picture
Carlos DeMarchena - Apr 19, 2011

I am sorry to inform you that Freakonomics report from the ecomomist was superceded by the South Park episode that made fun of why people pruchased hybrids...they basically are designed to give off "smug"

gillian langdon's picture
gillian langdon - Apr 19, 2011

Comment on "Freakonomics" interview.
To frame our attempts to think globally and act locally (bringing shopping bags to the supermarket and driving a Prius) as showing off for our neighbors is ridiculous! I care and I'm trying to do my best in changing my daily habits. When I go to the supermarket with my shopping bags I am thrilled to see someone else with their own bags. A sort of "Yes. We can do it!" I'm sorry you have wasted your interview on this cynical viewpoint when there is so much more we urgently need to do for the planet!

Pages