33

Energy plan ads just a bunch of wind?

Commentator Will Wilkinson

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF COMMENTARY

Scott Jagow: Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens is on a mission. Yesterday, he said he was creating an army of people to lobby for his energy plan. That plan is to move toward wind power and natural gas and away from imported oil. Commentator Will Wilkinson has been studying this, and so far, isn't impressed.


Will Wilkinson: Maybe you've seen T. Boone Pickens' commercial by now. The corporate takeover artist and hedge fund chairman is in the process of building the world's largest wind farm. He's also the nation's largest supplier of transportation-related natural gas.

Imagine Pickens' surprise when he discovered that our environmental and economic salvation is to use subsidized wind power to replace the natural gas we now use to generate electricity, and then to use that freed-up natural gas to power our cars. We could use new wind power to replace dirty coal instead. But that's not the plan.

All commercials are trying to sell us something. But Pickens' ad isn't aimed at us the consumers, but as voters sadly under-informed and easily stirred by appeals to emotion. The Pickens Plan is not about offering you, the consumer, a choice.

If wind power were more efficient than the alternatives, we'd already be using more of it. If natural gas cars were attractive to consumers, we'd already be driving more of them. The Pickens plan is about getting the government to use its powers to tax, regulate, and subsidize -- and pick winners in the energy sector.

When Pickens says:

T. Boone Pickens: Over $700 billion are leaving this country to foreign nations every year.

and adds up to:

Pickens: It'll be the largest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind.

He's leaning hard on our worst nationalist impulses and attacking the very idea of peaceful, mutually beneficial trade. Listening to Pickens, you'd never know we got something for all that money. What he's really saying is: Why buy the things you need from dangerous foreigners when you could be buying them from rock-ribbed Americans, like T. Boone Pickens?

In the end, The Pickens' plan is that government use its powers to make Pickens the winner. Don't help him. The last time Pickens spent millions on political ads, the Swift Boat Veterans offered us, the voters, their version of the truth. How do you like how that turned out?

Jagow: Will Wilkinson is a research fellow at the Cato Institute.

Pages

jeff myers's picture
jeff myers - Jul 31, 2008

When Pickens mentioned natural gas, I was suspicious. Now that I know he was behind the Swift Boat smear, I'm going to pass this story on to all my friends.
Thank you!

Jay Buchanan's picture
Jay Buchanan - Jul 31, 2008

This argument is flawed and misleading, more so than the one it's criticizing. Here's my take on it: http://theslippyexpress.blogspot.com/2008/07/cato-not-actually-fan-of-po...

Daniel Poirot's picture
Daniel Poirot - Jul 31, 2008

Pickens is putting his own money into wind. What is wrong with that? Wind is supposed to be the darling of the liberal media.

Wind in Texas is a big thing - accounting for up to 10% of the daily capacity: http://www.ercot.com/gridinfo/

There is no way that any freed up natural gas is ever going into cars - trucks maybe. The infrastructure isn't there and never will be. Plug-in cars will get here long before that. We will use the gas to generate electricity.

I applaud Pickens for coming up with a market-driven idea. Who came up with the stupid idea to devastate the global food market by mandating subsidized, corn-based ethanol?

THAT is something to oppose.

Pages