7

How ecstasy empire fell from its high

Lisa Sweetingham, author of "Chemical Cowboys"

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

Kai Ryssdal: Even though the Obama administration's not using the phrase "the war on drugs," it has just appointed a new drug czar. The police chief out of Seattle, Wash., got the job yesterday. When you think about what he'll be going after, it's probably the biggies that come to mind -- heroin, methamphetamine and cocaine probably. Ecstasy -- probably doesn't. It's a tiny little pill. Easy to transport and easy to consume. It delivers a huge high for users. And even bigger profits for dealers.

Lisa Sweetingham writes about the rise of America's favorite party drug and how the DEA tried to bring it down in her new book. It's called "Chemical Cowboys." Lisa, thanks for coming in.

LISA SWEETINGHAM: Thanks for having me.

Ryssdal: We have to start, I guess, at the most basic building block of this whole thing. Remind us what ecstasy is.

SWEETINGHAM: Right, it's a pill that has the chemical qualities of mescaline and methamphetamine, but it's not really a hallucinogen. And it creates this sort of euphoric high in the users.

Ryssdal: And those users are?

SWEETINGHAM: Mostly youth. In the mid 90s to late 90s it was really like 18-25 partiers, club goers, ravers.

Ryssdal: Where? Was it all over the country?

SWEETINGHAM: It was in the party triangle.

Ryssdal: A phrase I'm not familiar with.

SWEETINGHAM: It's a very popular phrase among drug enforcement. The party triangle is Miami, New York and Los Angeles because that's where the pills were being brought in by mules and shipped to the different night scenes.

Ryssdal: Where were they coming from these pills? I mean tell us the background of this story.

SWEETINGHAM: Israeli organized crime dominated the trafficking of the pills. But the pills weren't coming from Israel. They were made in the Netherlands, they were made in clandestine labs in Belgium and around the southern part of the Netherlands. Israel ex-pats who were involved in drug trafficking realized that they couldn't infiltrate the cocaine or heroin trade, those were entrenched in the drug cartels of Central and South America. But nobody was looking at ecstasy. Ecstasy among law enforcement was called "kiddie dough." And the demand for ecstasy in American was phenomenal. And these little pills that were maybe anywhere from a nickel or a quarter to make could fetch up to $25 to $50 in a nightclub.

Ryssdal: So when did the DEA really start cracking down on this and how long did it take them to get a handle on this trade?

SWEETINGHAM: I think in 1999 essentially when they found a dead body in the trunk of a Lexus in Brentwood they realized that this was a pretty dangerous drug, and they needed to take a closer look at it.

Ryssdal: Out here on the west side of Los Angeles.

SWEETINGHAM: That's right. And they tried to get a handle on who was in charge and what was going on. And that's when they realized that this one man, Oded Tuito, was responsible for about 80 percent of the entire ecstasy supply in the United States. The agent that I follow in the book, Bob Gagne, he was obsessed with bringing Tuito down. And he really worked a lot with the Dutch police and the Israeli police to try to winnow down his networks. And it took, though, many, many years. And it took law enforcement around the world to come together to do it.

Ryssdal: Whatever happened to Oded Tuito?

SWEETINGHAM: Well, I can tell that he was finally captured. But you'll have to read the book to find out what happens to him. Because it's really part of the ending.

Ryssdal: Is this story though a success story for the DEA and for this effort to crackdown on this drug?

SWEETINGHAM: Well, that's a great question. Is it? And the agents that I spoke to they won't take credit for it, they won't say it, but the former dealers -- and people on both sides of the law really -- that I spoke to pretty much confirmed that Israelis have abandoned the trade. All of these high-profile arrests and all these seizures made it difficult for them. However, you know, how it works. Once one group gets out another group comes in. And so now what we're seeing is Asian drug trafficking organizations that are no longer making the drugs in Amsterdam, but they're making them in Canada. And they're bringing in these precursor chemicals from China, they're shipping them in, and they're actually mixing the drugs with methamphetamine, and if it's got meth in it, and it's like a nice cheap filler, it's easier for them to make, and also it's much more addictive, which means they'll have more customers.

Ryssdal: The book by Lisa Sweetingham about the ecstasy trade is called "Chemical Cowboys." Lisa, thanks a lot.

SWEETINGHAM: Thank you for having me.

Phil Mocek's picture
Phil Mocek - Mar 13, 2009

Ms. Sweetingham wrote, "you're right, pure MDMA is not physically addictive. Some users talk about being emotionally addicted to the drug, but physical addiction isn't really an issue."

"Un-pure" MDMA is not MDMA, but a mixture of MDMA and other things. If you're concerned with the dangers of MDMA mixed with other things, then let's talk about moving from prohibitionist drug policy to regulatory drug policy. Strict regulation and control of psychoactive substances by the state would improve the situation. Fear mongering will not.

"Some users" of bon bons talk about being emotionally addicted to them, but physical addiction to them "isn't really an issue" (or even kind of "an issue") because it *never happens*. Bon bons -- like MDMA -- are not physically addictive.

Please stop spreading misinformation.

Don Meinshausen's picture
Don Meinshausen - Mar 13, 2009

As a convicted X dealerwho had celebrity clients I was wondering whether Lisa interviewed Rick Doblin of MAPS who has gotten government approval to do research on X and what her thoughts are on legalizing it for use in treating traumas, addictions etc.

Phil Mocek's picture
Phil Mocek - Mar 13, 2009

In response to a comment by W. Ross, Ms. Sweetingham wrote, "as I mentioned, when MDMA is made with methamphetamine, which is what law enforcement is seeing more of now, then potential addiction becomes a real concern."

MDMA is not "made with methamphetamine." MDMA is sometimes *adulterated* with methamphetamine, in which case the product is no longer MDMA, but a mix of MDMA and methamphetamine. This a very significant difference, and it is irresponsible for you, Ms. Sweetingham, to spread such misinformation.

As with most other prohibited substances, the primary dangers associated with this one come not from the drug itself but from the results of our policies of prohibition. Aspirin (or anything else) would be dangerous if it was relegated to the black market and adulterated with methamphetamine.

Chris Bevis's picture
Chris Bevis - Mar 13, 2009

Not to quibble, but I think the author meant to compare MDMA to "mescaline" ( a hallucinogen ) not to "mesclun" ( salad mix. )

Lisa Sweetingham's picture
Lisa Sweetingham - Mar 12, 2009

How nice to be able to read feedback on the blog!
I think both your comments are fair, and while a radio segment doesn't have the luxury of time to go into these other aspects of MDMA, they are discussed in the book. W. Ross, you're right, pure MDMA is not physically addictive. Some users talk about being emotionally addicted to the drug, but physical addiction isn't really an issue. However, as I mentioned, when MDMA is made with methamphetamine, which is what law enforcement is seeing more of now, then potential addiction becomes a real concern. In fact, a recent New York Times article noted that 55 percent of the U.S. seizures of Ecstasy at the northern border in 2006 contained methamphetamine. The Canadian government claims that 70 percent of the samples they seized in 2006 contained meth.

W Ross's picture
W Ross - Mar 12, 2009

Like many drugs that are currently illegal.... Candace is right...MDMA has a legitimate medical use.
The author also incorrectly referred to the drug as being addictive, which numerous studies have proven to not be true.
The feeling that one would get from taking MDMA may be desired, but there is no chemical dependency. NO ONE has ever died from MDMA either. Most of the people who were credited as dying from ecstasy had either overheated from not intaking enough fluids, over hydrated from too much fluid, or had pills that were tainted. Sadly, if the drug were regulated and people were educated about it, those deaths could have been avoided and this drug wouldn't be so taboo for the more legitimate uses.

candace butler's picture
candace butler - Mar 12, 2009

NPR's reports usually amaze me with their thoughtfulness. I was surprised and dissappointed in the limited scope of this report. A little balance in talking about the background would have given a more accurate picture. MDMA, pharmaceudical "ecstasy", was legally and very succesfully used well into the 80s for therapies and counseling. Legal reasearch continues and it's been found helpful for PTSD and other conditions and situations as well. Like many medicines, there is abuse, tampering, crime, etc. but that "rest of the story" begs to be included.
Thank you for your consideration.