19

Bitter fight developing over sugar beets

A sugar beet in the ground ready for harvest

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: The most heavily-traded futures contract in New York today was not oil. It wasn't gold. You'll probably never guess, so I'll just go ahead and give you the answer: Sugar was the hot commodity today as traders backed it down off 28-year highs. Rumors of a big purchase by the Indian government helped drive that.

Here in this country more than half our sugar comes from beets. From a beet crop that is almost entirely genetically modified. Organic farmers and food-safety advocates are suing to keep that crop out of the ground this coming spring. From the Marketplace Entrepreneurship Desk at Oregon Public Broadcasting, Mitchell Hartman reports.


MITCHELL HARTMAN: If the Midwest is the nation's breadbasket, then Oregon's Willamette Valley might be called its "seed basket."

FRANK MORTON: The Willamette Valley is a world-class place to grow seeds. We have good soils, ample water. But really it's the climate. It's a dry summer and a mild, moist winter.

Frank Morton came here as a young man from West Virginia and quickly got into farming. He now runs Wild Garden Seed, which produces 150 varieties of organic seeds. He showed me around his drying shed, piled high with escarole, peppers and table beets.

MORTON: My workers are over here sowing seed flats with my Bull's Blood beet, MacGregor's beet.

Morton's organic seed farm is tiny: five acres and a greenhouse. There are 5,000 acres of commercial sugar-beet seed planted across this valley. Nationwide, sugar beets are a $3 billion crop. And nearly all of those beets are genetically engineered to resist an herbicide called Roundup.

It's made by Monsanto, and when it's used on Roundup-ready plants like corn, alfalfa and sugar beets, it kills all the weeds in a field, but crops are left unharmed because they have a gene that makes them immune. And therein lies the problem for Frank Morton.

MORTON: Actually, a mile and a quarter east of here is a sugar-beet seed farm. I'm upwind of that guy. But not exactly upwind of him.

That wind could carry genetically-engineered sugar-beet pollen into Morton's organic farm, and contaminate his crop.

MORTON: If biotech traits show up in my seeds, then my seeds are worthless. If my traits show up in conventional or biotech seeds, it's not a big deal to them, it does not destroy their value. It's an asymmetrical relationship we have here.

Organic growers have raised similar concerns about genetically engineered soy beans, corn and other crops. This time they're looking to tip the balance back. They spearheaded a lawsuit charging the USDA approved Roundup Ready sugar beets without assessing potential environmental impacts, like genetic contamination and herbicide resistance.

In September, a federal judge ordered the USDA to do the environmental review. It could take years. In the meantime, the farmers and their allies are headed back to court.

Zelig Golden is a lawyer with the Center for Food Safety.

ZELIG GOLDEN: We're going to be moving the court to issue a permanent injunction to halt the sale and planting of GE sugar-beet seeds now and into the future, until the USDA does its job to protect consumers and farmers alike.

That would help the organic farmers. But there are 10,000 non-organic farmers raising more than a million acres of Roundup Ready sugar beets in 11 states. Along with Monsanto and the big seed companies, farmers are trying to protect their multi-billion-dollar business from a planting ban next spring. Monsanto, which has the patent for Roundup Ready seeds, wouldn't comment for this story, citing the pending litigation.

Luther Markwart of the American Sugar Beet Growers Association says more is at stake than the revenue from next year's crop.

LUTHER MARKWART: This is a food security issue. We need to make sure that we have a good, strong, viable domestic beet-sugar industry.

And he says the environmentalists have this one all wrong.

MARKWART: What you find with Roundup is you use one herbicide, you can apply it typically half as often. So this is a much more environmentally friendly way of raising our crop.

Markwart says 95 percent of the crop nationwide has converted to Roundup Ready in just the past three years. And he insists organic growers can be protected using traditional methods like monitoring and isolation. Frank Morton says just one accident could ruin him.

The parties meet in court next month. In a similar case, a judge banned Roundup Ready alfalfa; Monsanto's appealing that decision to the Supreme Court. If there's a ban on sugar-beet planting nationwide, it's doubtful there's enough conventional seed in storage to lay in a crop next spring.

I'm Mitchell Hartman for Marketplace.

About the author

Mitchell Hartman is the senior reporter for Marketplace’s Entrepreneurship Desk and also covers employment.

Pages

Chuck Palazzo's picture
Chuck Palazzo - Nov 22, 2009

This is the same Monsanto that is using funds they acquired, as a result of developing and selling to the US Government, Dioxin (the killer ingredient in Agent Orange). The insidious poison that continues to kill! Monsanto and others like them, should be banned - period!

Mike Hansen's picture
Mike Hansen - Nov 20, 2009

How in the world can you do a story like this and not provide a disclaimer that Monsanto (aka the bad guy in your story) is a financial supporter of your show? It's amazing that your coverage on this issue always has that sort of "fair and balanced" nonsense reporting approach that treats both sides of an important issue with equal respect even when one side is clearly wrong.

herbert browne's picture
herbert browne - Nov 20, 2009

Not enough non-GMO sugar beet seed? Oh, No! Does that mean that Americans will be forced into buying from the world market (eg Cuba, Brazil, etc) in the future? Well, world sugar prices are about HALF of what "we" pay in this country. So, the consumer is the winner, right?
As for having a "nationally secure" source of sugar, why don't we hear that about oil. Oh, wait... we Do; but it hasn't changed anything. We simply buy foreign oil and go about our business.
I find it Beyond "merely interesting" that Monsanto has chosen crops to provide G-M seed for that are also the crops for which the Federal government has "price supports" in place. I think it's actually Monsanto's BUSINESS MODEL, to use the American farming community as a funnel to suck up our tax money that provides subsidies to farmers (who are, to a great degree, agribiz giants with no need for subsidies at all). ^..^

Sarah West's picture
Sarah West - Nov 20, 2009

Through a horticulture program I am attending in the Portland area, I recently had the opportunity to visit Frank Morton's seed farm and the organic vegetable farm it partners with (Gathering Together Farm). I was impressed by the sophisticated level of innovation and creativity with which the two farms produce a high quality and quantity of organic vegetables and seed on such a small parcel of land (50 acres total, 5 in seed production). The partnership is a marvelous example of small-scale sustainable land use.

While it is not a multi-billion dollar industry, the example such an operation presents to young farmers in a rapidly changing industry one day might become worth billions. Let's protect these knowledge-building, experimenting enterprises from the heavy hand of big industry. National security also comes from the strength of diversity and an eye on the future, not just the short-term gain from a Monsanto sugar beet monocrop.

Kurt Borchardt's picture
Kurt Borchardt - Nov 19, 2009

I'm teaching a high school biotech class, we just finished watching "The Future of Food." I can't wait to share this story with my class tomorrow. It's absolutely amazing to me how quickly GMO crops have spread without a detailed environmental impact review. Try building a tract of houses...you'll spend years completing environmental impact reviews; we don't eat homes, but somehow GMO's get fast tracked/skip environmental reviews???

Siri Erickson-Brown's picture
Siri Erickson-Brown - Nov 19, 2009

How could sugar beet growers have been so foolhardy and shortsighted as to not retain enough non-GMO seed to get their crop in? This lawsuit has been in the works for more than a year, and a smart farmer would have a backup plan.

Michael Cothroll's picture
Michael Cothroll - Nov 19, 2009

I want to hear more GMO/Ag-business related stories! They have large economic consequences. Which should be a series of stories in and of itself.

Marketplace did a better job of covering this story than when I last wrote in a comment.

However it's still kind of fishy to have a company(Monsanto) that underwrites for public media, but is always unable to comment when it's name comes up in a story.

I also think that any media outlet has an obligation to disclose the relationship of the underwriters in every story where they (Monsanto) are in question.

David Brown's picture
David Brown - Nov 19, 2009

The big corporations suggest that organic farmers could isolate their crops to keep out G.M. pollen - like require them to build a big air-and-insect-and-light-tight tent over their whole farms? Wouldn't it be more fair for the G.M. farms to do this?
To me, a maybe more troubling story is about those innocent farmers who've been sued by the big corporations for "stealing" their technology, and prevented from growing their own seed stock, when in reality the G.M. pollen and/or seed blew across the line into the traditional farmer's field. The Supreme Court should block those type of suits, which no small farmer can afford to fight.

Beth Giroux's picture
Beth Giroux - Nov 19, 2009

Markwart states "So this is a much more environmentally friendly way..." As opposed to what...DDT? Its not friendly to anybody but Monsanto's bottom line.

Pages