The economic impact of presidents, past and future

U.S. President Barack Obama waves as he arrives back at the White House on January 4, 2012 in Washington, DC. Today, the president will ask for power from Congress to slim down a number of government agencies.

Jeremy Hobson: Now let's get to the big story this morning -- that would be Mitt Romney's victory in the New Hampshire primary.

Our regular Wednesday guest Josh Brown of Fusion Analytics is with us live from New York to dig into some of the criticism Romney laid out last night. Good morning, Josh.

Josh Brown: Good morning.

Hobson: So I want to play you something Romney said last night about the potential economic choice between him and President Obama.

Mitt Romney: He wants to turn America into a European-style social welfare state. We want to ensure that we remain a free and prosperous land of opportunity.

So Josh Brown, a "European-style social welfare state" -- is that what folks like you on Wall Street think is happening?

Brown: You know, there's always a little bit of concern from anyone on Wall Street when they see things like health care plans, etc. But I don't think that anyone believes that that's where we are right now. That really sounds more like Romney preaching to the Tea Party that has not quite come his way just yet.

Hobson: How much control do you see the president, whoever it is -- whether it's Romney or Paul or somebody else, or President Obama come 2012 -- how much power do they have over the economy?

Brown: Jeremy, here's the dirty little secret: the truth is, they could make things much, much worse, but there's very little they can do to improve things. So typically, when you look at who's in the White House, who controls Congress, it's all a myth -- there is no correlation. No one is any better than anyone else between Democrats and Republicans.

As a matter of fact, if you would have said back in 2008, I can't believe they're going to elect Obama -- he's anti-business, he's anti-captialism; in the meantime, the S&P 500 is up over 50 percent since January of 2009 when Obama was sworn into office.

So I think the president's impact on the economy is not quite what politicians would like it to be.

Hobson: Josh Brown of Fusion Analytics, thanks so much.

Brown: Thank you.

About the author

Josh Brown is a New York City-based financial adviser at Fusion Analytics.
Log in to post2 Comments

Only in Mitt’s wildest, fundamentalist economic dreams. We should be emulating Europe’s example—particularly Scandinavian Europe. After all, they’re the most successful economies in the world. Why are conservatives bent on following China’s model totalitarian state capitalism? Later this year, after euro zone countries refuse to bail out their banks at the expense of their populations—parting ways with the American ideal of mafia capitalism—this financial crisis will be seen for what it really is: a loan-sharking crisis rather than a “debt crisis.” To date, however, nothing has really been done to keep us from sliding into corporate statism.

Are you guys kidding? Stimulus. Obamacare. Obstacles to oil drilling and pipelines at every turn. Expansive new EPA regs. Unprecedented aid/support of labor unions. New mileage standards for automakers and now for semis. Whether you are for or against these policies, you have to admit that in sum, they have had a substantial impact on our economy. Just in fuel prices alone, we've transferred so much of our wealth overseas. Yes, the president has significantly reshaped the economy.

With Generous Support From...