2

States must make health care decisions

The deadline for states to decide whether they'll run their own insurance exchanges is looming.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

It's decision time again in health care.

No, not for you. States are making this one. Namely, whether they will operate their own health care exchanges or let the federal government do it. They've got til Friday to decide.

Exchanges, you'll remember, are the online sites where small businesses and people who aren't insured at work, will be able to shop for health insurance starting in 2014.

States? The fed? You may be wondering what difference it makes anyway.

Well, here’s one difference, says Georgetown professor Sabrina Corlette: power.

“A state that’s going to run its own exchange has an opportunity to really change the entire health care landscape if it wants to do that,” she says.

So for example, says Corlette, say a state has a big obesity problem. The state can make sure all the insurance plans on the exchange cover programs aimed at reducing obesity.

“Essentially the state is using its market clout to get the health plans and the providers to change their behavior and reduce healthcare costs over the long run,” she says.

But more than half the states aren’t expected to go that route; they’ll let the federal government operate their exchanges.

With that, though, comes predictability. Sonya Schwartz at the National Academy for State Health Policy thinks that could be attractive to insurance companies.

“Health plans may be able to just come to the federal exchange and fill out their information and select multiple states all at once, rather than going to one state at a time,” says Schwartz.

Everybody wants lots and lots of insurers offering plans on the exchanges. The theory goes the more competition, the lower the price.

So I ask Robert Zirkelbach with America’s Health Insurance Plans what the industry prefers.

“It’s too early to know how the federal exchange will compare to what the state exchanges are going to look like,” he says.

Here’s the thing -- insurers have concerns either way. With Washington at the helm, they worry about extra regulation. States on the other hand, can set standards that make it harder and more costly for companies. No matter what happens, states and the federal government will be racing to get exchanges in place.

And Bryce Williams with the consulting firm Towers Watson says there’s a lot that can go wrong.

“There are definitely going to be some bumps in the first few months and years of these state exchanges going live,” says Williams.

Overall, most health care analysts agree the shopping experience -- going online to pick a plan -- won’t be much different between a federal and state exchange.

The real question is: Will insurance be cheaper in one state over another?

The answer: We don’t know. And probably won’t for a while.

BernardW's picture
BernardW - Jan 6, 2013

Health care is the most important aspect for any country. And the health care exchanges are introduced so that people will be benefited by the health insurance schemes. In my opinion states should be allowed to make their own health care decisions. Because states know better about the problems of their people more and can plan the schemes accordingly.
http://urgentcarenow.com/

james_walter86's picture
james_walter86 - Dec 12, 2012

"So for example, says Corlette, say a state has a big obesity problem. The state can make sure all the insurance plans on the exchange cover programs aimed at reducing obesity."

This is an example of what I do not like about Obamacare. I am 60, single, have never weighed over 165. Why on Earth would I want to join a risk pool covering obesity, pregnancy, abortion and birth control? These (all voluntary, I would add) conditions are not just "low risk" for me, they are quite impossible and I would not be "sharing" risk with the other insured in that pool.

Allow me to shop for a realistic plan for my circumstances, including a high-deductible catastrophic policy, that will reduce my health care costs, which by the way are nearly zero since I broke an arm some years back.