EPA creating more CO2?
TEXT OF STORY
Doug Krizner: The head of the Environmental Protection Agency faces scrutiny today from a House oversight committee. Democratic chair Henry Waxman wants EPA chief Stephen Johnson to explain why his agency approved a new coal-fired power plant in Utah — the first such permit since a landmark Supreme Court ruling on greenhouses gases. Sarah Gardner reports from the Marketplace Sustainability Desk.
Sarah Gardner: Waxman has chastised the EPA for approving a small coal-fired plant in northeast Utah this past summer. He says the Supreme Court ruled in April the agency can regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and the agency is ignoring the threat of global warming by approving CO2-spewing power plants.
David Doniger, at the Natural Resources Defense Council, agrees:
David Doniger: The power plants that are built now will be around for 50 or 60 years. It really matters what technology they choose to use.
A spokeswoman for EPA chief Stephen Johnson wouldn’t comment on his upcoming testimony. She said the agency is still weighing a decision whether to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants.
Waxman is asking the EPA for a moratorium on permits for coal-fired plants until the agency takes CO2 emissions into account.
I’m Sarah Gardner for Marketplace.
Stories You Might Like
There’s a lot happening in the world. Through it all, Marketplace is here for you.
You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible.
Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.
