17

Time to focus on jobs and growth

Robert Reich

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Kai Ryssdal: We know a little more today about how the next round of the budget fight is going to shape up. The GOP named its members of the super committee that's supposed to agree on $1 trillion-plus in federal budget cuts.

Commentator Robert Reich says the problem isn't just a failure to compromise. It's that it takes our eye way off the ball.


Robert Reich: We're slouching toward a double dip because we're getting the problem wrong. We're not in a debt crisis. Our current crisis is jobs, wages and growth.

The economy is almost at a standstill, with almost no growth in the first half of the year. Although Friday's job report showed 117,000 new jobs in July, that's not enough to keep up with population growth, which means even more people have stopped looking for work.

A smaller percent of adult Americans is now working full time than in almost three decades.

The Fed cannot boost the economy by itself. Its near-zero interest rates haven't worked to date and there's no reason to suppose they'll work any better in the future.

We also need an expansive fiscal policy. Yet last week's budget deal makes it politically harder to enact the stimulus we need. There's a huge gap between what increasingly scared consumers are willing to spend and what the economy could produce at or near full employment.

Republicans continue to claim the original stimulus didn't work, but revised data show the drop in 2008 far greater than assumed. The economy plunged 8.9 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 -- the steepest quarterly decline in more than half a century. And in 2009 household buying contracted more than it has in almost 60 years.

So, the original stimulus was way too small to offset this. With cash-starved state and local governments simultaneously scaling back their own spending, the stimulus needed to be even bigger.

The only hope now is voters will tell their members of Congress, who are on recess back home, to enact a bold jobs plan to jumpstart the economy. The government can now borrow money more cheaply than ever and use it for our roads, bridges, ports, parks, schools and everything else that's being neglected -- including more than 20 million Americans who want and need work.


Ryssdal: Robert Reich was secretary of labor for President Clinton. His most recent book is called Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future. Next week, David Frum. Send us your comments -- click on this contact link.

About the author

Robert Reich is chancellor's professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton.

Pages

John McFarland's picture
John McFarland - Aug 10, 2011

Dear Monique,

You are missing my point. We need to turn loose the American entrepreneur spirit. Already many of the best technology developments are created in the US. However, when they move to production, they move overseas for a cheaper work force and reduced taxes. Let us change this dynamic. If our corporate tax rates were more attractive, business would find it more profitable to do work on US soil. This will lead to more jobs, which will increase our tax base and reduce the deficit. We need bold leadership that is willing to throw out our current tax code.

Monique DC's picture
Monique DC - Aug 10, 2011

I am most surprised at the comments. Many times Mr. Reich has delivered editorials on the need to build up the manufacturing and R&D areas of our economy. It seems all we focus upon is what we think have lost: good jobs, confidence, a bright future. We need a common goal, a challenge as a country - something similar to the Kennedy push to the moon. Look at Germany. They declare they will be fossil free shortly..and focus upon new technologies and approaches. This is the heart of what Americans are known for...rising to a challenge, being creative and innovative. We are wasting this opportunity to create a new future. It's not just infrastructure, it is a different kind of infrastructure. Cities not built for only the use of cars, as example. I encourage you to read the 10 approaches offered by former Pres Clinton's foundation. It is heady stuff. If we had a leader or leaders who would capture our imagination and support (with policy, funding and enthusiasm) moving in a new direction toward achieving the "big goal"(with education, with manufacturing, with innovation and with Pride) how exciting would that be! I urge my fellow commenters to think of what the possiblites are rather than what they believe has been lost.

John McFarland's picture
John McFarland - Aug 10, 2011

Robert Reich is so predictable. “Print more money and have the government decide who gets it.” It is total lunacy. What we need to do is encourage businesses to produce more products on US soil. We have one of the highest productivity levels per worker of any nation yet we do nothing to bring jobs to our country. The President needs to wake up and become a leader and to stop point fingers. The tax code has to completely change. Either adopt a flat tax rate (15% & 25% for higher income plus lower or no corporate tax) and eliminate all deductions or go with the Fair Tax Plan, which is like a VAT tax. By making these changes, we will encourage business and entrepreneurs to grow their business and to bring jobs onto US soil.

Dave Chapman's picture
Dave Chapman - Aug 10, 2011

OK- fine, spend another trillion or two (or three) in govt. stimulus to get the private sector to hire. Here's one small caveat: You have to pay for it via a credible plan baked into law. Please note: the U.S was just downgraded because of the lack of such a credible plan.

Richard C's picture
Richard C - Aug 10, 2011

Yep, let’s hand all the unemployed waitresses, assembly line workers and paper pushers the keys to bulldozers, earthmovers and cement mixers and see what happens.

I heard something a week ago that may be the key to the problem, or at least a major part of it: 90% of our workforce is “service”, i.e. only 10% are making things. It wasn’t clear whether that included agriculture.

As far as “stimulating” the economy goes, for $800 B (2009 stimulus) we could have randomly selected 10 million households, sent each one $80,000 and said, “Go Forth and Buy!” A few restrictions, such as that it can’t just be banked or “invested”. Need a new car? OK, but it better be American made. Need the co-pay for an operation you’ve been putting of? OK. Need a new roof or appliances? OK. But the whole amount must be spent in a year.

As suggested by one of the other commentators, he 2009 stimulus didn’t do much. Mostly it was funneled to states that ended up using it to avoid fixing budget troubles, e.g. they used it to keep teachers and others working.

John Griffin's picture
John Griffin - Aug 10, 2011

I like and respectRobert Reich. I do disagree with him here.If the "stimulus bill" focused on America's infilstucture instead of over 8000 earmarks, it may have worked and been worth the money. It only helped contributors to thier campaigns. Not the American people. What was it I heard an average of over $200,000 per "new" job?
I don't have trust or faith in "any" established polotician.

Timothy Henderson's picture
Timothy Henderson - Aug 10, 2011

Even though a stimulus might help create jobs, why isn't our nation's eye on the markets that free trade was suppose to open up? Are those who supported such measures now admitting they are failed policies by ignoring them as a valid option? Through Reich's focus on internal consumption through increased spending we fall into the trap of continuing to be a nation of consumption and not of production, which is the foundation of wealth.

Pages