'Cliff' fix should include triggers
President Barack Obama speaking during a press conference Nov. 14, 2012 in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C. Commentator Robert Reich says we should hold tax increases and spending cuts until economy improves.
The president and Congress need to be careful on how they craft any deal to back us away from the fiscal cliff.
We’ve got two big economic challenges ahead: getting the economy back on track, and getting the budget deficit under control.
The problem is, the two require opposite strategies. We get the economy back on track by boosting demand through low taxes and continued government spending. We get the budget deficit under control by raising taxes and reducing government spending.
But if we do too much deficit reduction too soon, we're in trouble. That's why the fiscal cliff is dangerous. The Congressional Budget Office and most independent economists say it will pull so much demand out of the economy that it'll push us back into recession. That’s the austerity trap of low growth, high unemployment, and falling government revenues Europe finds itself in. We don’t want to go there.
Although the U.S. economy is picking up and unemployment trending downward, we’re still not out of the woods. So the government has to continue to spend, and the vast middle class has to keep spending as well, unimpeded by any tax increase.
But waiting too long to reduce the deficit will also harm the economy -- spooking creditors and causing interest rates to rise.
It all boils down to timing and sequencing: first, we get the economy back on track, and then we tackle the budget deficit.
This is why any “grand bargain” to avert the fiscal cliff should contain a starting trigger that begins serious spending cuts and tax increases only when the economy is strong enough. I’d make that trigger two consecutive quarters of 6 percent unemployment and 3 percent economic growth.
To make sure this doesn’t become a means of avoiding deficit reduction altogether, that trigger should be built right into any “grand bargain” -- irrevocable unless two-thirds of the House and Senate agree, and the president signs on.
The trigger would reassure creditors we're serious about getting our fiscal house in order. And it would allow us to achieve our two goals in the right sequence -- getting the economy back on track, and then getting the budget deficit under control. It’s sensible and doable. But will Congress and the president do it?