5

Brown relishes campaign spending gap

California Attorney General Jerry Brown speaks during a news conference in Los Angeles, Calif.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Kai Ryssdal: Last night was primary night in a lot of states. Out here in California, though, we are well into general election season. Yesterday, we told you about former eBay CEO Meg Whitman and how she's trying to become the governor of California. A big part of her strategy is sheer financial firepower. She's spent $100 million so far. Her Democratic opponent Jerry Brown hasn't. Brown served two terms as governor back in the 1970s. He's now the state attorney general. His campaign's spent less than a million dollars.

April Dembosky reports Brown does seem to relish the spending gap.


April Dembosky: One of the things Jerry Brown is best known for is the blue Plymouth Satellite he drove when he was governor of California. He snubbed the chauffeured limousine and refused to live in the governor's mansion. Brown says his thrift dates back to his days in a Jesuit seminary.

Jerry Brown: I spent many, many hours studying about the virtue of poverty.

Brown is no pauper. He has investments and lives in a $1.8 million house in the Oakland hills. But his pockets aren't nearly as deep as Whitman's.

His campaign is headquartered in a former box company warehouse in Oakland. Makeshift plastic desks line the walls, a sign in the kitchen beckons staff to take turns bringing in coffee. The day I visited, the phones weren't working.

In the face of his opponent's wealth, Brown is turning his penny pinching into a campaign message.

Brown: The word "frugality" is not something we hear anymore.

In some ways, Brown has little choice but to make a virtue of his thrift. He doesn't have the money to match Whitman's spending on advertising. His most recent financial disclosure shows his campaign has $23 million -- about half of what Whitman has already spent on TV, radio and Internet ads. Brown devotes about a third of his campaign time to fundraising. Much of the rest of the time, he's giving interviews and trying to score free media at rallies and other events. He also gets news coverage in his role as attorney general.

Recent polls have the candidates running about even.

Allan Hoffenblum: Jerry Brown is reacting rather than pro-acting.

Allan Hoffenblum publishes an annual guide to California elections and has consulted for Republican candidates.

Hoffenblum: He's reacting to the Meg Whitman campaign, he's reacting to news reports that he hasn't put together a good message, he's reacting to Democratic activists saying, "When are you going to get your act together?"

Those activists would mainly be labor unions, who see Whitman's agenda mostly focused on the wealthy. Brown isn't planning to start his campaign in earnest until after Labor Day. He doesn't want to risk running out of money in the critical weeks before the November 2 election. In the meantime, the unions are trying to counter Whitman's barrage of radio and TV spots with ads on Brown's behalf.

Union anti-Meg Whitman ad: Meg Whitman's never let the truth or the rules get in the way of helping herself.

So far, Brown's allies have spent about $8 million. But they're relying even more on their manpower. Rebecca Greenberg is with the California Labor Federation. It represents more than two million union members in private and public sector jobs.

Rebecca Greenberg: We will be outspent. We will be outspent, maybe by 5-to-1, but we will not be out-organized. We've got the boots on the ground.

Last week, the group teamed up with a local union of engineers in downtown Oakland.

Greenberg: Quick information from the union about Meg Whitman?

Six organizers handed out scores of fliers to other unionized workers getting off their shift.

U.C. San Diego political science professor Thad Kousser is an expert on California politics. He says the unions's one-on-one strategy has a record of success.

Thad Kousser: That works a lot better than an anonymous phone bank with a robo call urging you to turn out to vote.

But the problem with California, he said, is the state is just too big to knock on everyone's door.

Kousser: We have to have wholesale rather than retail politics in California. So if you want to reach 10 million voters, you're going to do that much more effectively with television commercials than you are with even the best organized set of ground troops.

Brown isn't planning to air his first campaign ads until the second week of September.

Brown: There is the old story of the tortoise and the hare. And the hare jumps around almost like a 30-second spot, but at the end of the day, it's the tortoise that gets across the finish line.

Of course, that's because the hare takes a nap in the middle of the race. Whitman has millions more to spend, and Brown shouldn't expect her campaign to rest any time before election day.

In Oakland, Calif., I'm April Dembosky for Marketplace.

James Twomey's picture
James Twomey - Aug 15, 2010

How can the people of California even consider allowing a billionaire to buy the leadership of their state? No matter what she stands for it will be obscured by $200,000,000.00 in campaign funds supporting her and tearing down her opponent. There is no truth in anything this woman is saying except that the almighty dollar is king and queen. If she wins that could be called just another signal that Democracy is dead in the US and that only corporate interests and those of the wealthy are thriving.

Jonathan Lovelace's picture
Jonathan Lovelace - Aug 13, 2010

Anyone can be frugal when he doesn't have much money, so Brown's present austerity is not necessarily a sign that he'll show any fiscal or economic sense if he's elected. For that, you'd have to look at when he was governor--which I am too young to remember.

Joe Seefus's picture
Joe Seefus - Aug 13, 2010

I'm not a Democrat but I would like to pose this one question: Taking into account the State of California's predominantly pro-Democratic Party leaning during the last decade or two and the present political environment, exactly how much money does a Democratic candidate have to spend to get his or her message out when that message is "Vote for me - I'm not a Republican"?

Charles Mason's picture
Charles Mason - Aug 12, 2010

1. I don't think Calfiornian's realize the rest of the nation finds them strange. It's not like Meg Whittman is a die hard republician, look at her stances. She supports abortion, illegal immigrants getting a public school education and pro-green, plus supports same sex marriage just not the overturning of Proposition 8. That's not even independent in most cases she's a dem with some moderate fluxations.
2. Let's not get into bashing people because they're rich and amass wealth for themselves. The goal of every business owner is to amass wealth depending on they're meaning of wealth for themselves and a legacy for they're children. If you didn't have that drive then many others would be out of work, in business you either move forward or behind and, stagnation is like equal to falling behind because others will pass you. With that being said there is nothing in Meg Whittman's past that suggest she benefits or benefited from corporate corruption, greed and scandels. If anything the invention of EBay not only shows the type of inovation necessary to put the economy back on it's feet but especially the cash strapped state of California (which I might add with resources from wine, and fruit, to I.T, to 3 top research univeristies should be nowhere near broke). The creation of EBAy also shows her ability to make money by putting choice into the hands of the consumer. I think California should welcome Meg Whittman and not be dupped by a man who speaks austerity but lives in a $1.8 million dollar house and just can't afford to fund a campaign. If he can't afford a campaign how can he afford to be govener of a state.

Joseph Hinton's picture
Joseph Hinton - Aug 11, 2010

Rather than representing someone who would be free from influence peddlars due to her independent wealth if Meg Whitman is elected California's gov. residents would be installing someone whose benefitted from the same system of corporate greed and excess that the nation should be scrutinizing if not rejecting outright. People like Meg Whitman should be put in their rightful place and that doesn't mean the governor's mansion or the White House where she would certainly pass on her sense of corporate largesse to her peers and not her constituents.