2

Bill may up profile of political sponsors

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Bill Radke: It looks like Democrats in Congress will introduce a bill to make companies and unions tell us when they give money for political advertising. This is a response to that Supreme Court ruling in January that the government can't restrict those contributions. Marketplace's John Dimsdale has the story.


John Dimsdale: The Supreme Court's ruling isn't likely to be overturned, so campaign finance reformers are left pushing for more disclosure of who's giving how much to which candidate.

Bob Edgar: Nobody can tell me our founding fathers were sitting around a table saying that money was to be considered under the freedom of speech provisions of the constitution.

Common Cause's Bob Edgar says contributors should be a visible presence in campaign ads, and that could end up in the legislation.

Edgar: I want them to come on and have their face and voice on the television ads.

But Brad Smith with the Center for Competitive Politics is skeptical about on-screen endorsements:

Brad Smith: What would be gained by that? If we went out and did a survey, I don't think you would find 10 percent of Americans that could name more than two corporate CEOs and actually attach them to the corporation.

The upcoming legislation is expected to set out how groups sponsoring political ads will disclose their donors.

In Washington, I'm John Dimsdale for Marketplace.

About the author

As head of Marketplace’s Washington, D.C. bureau, John Dimsdale provides insightful commentary on the intersection of government and money for the entire Marketplace portfolio.
Focus Laurent's picture
Focus Laurent - Aug 5, 2010

I need some one to sponsor me on specied agreement in polititcs

Harvey Johnson's picture
Harvey Johnson - Apr 14, 2010

Who would not want the truth to be told about which corporation paid for the campaign / campaign add? The contributor who wants to buy away democracy and the corrupt congressman that is selling influence.

Ban the imaginary advocacy groups created by influence buyers to hide the truth, like the "People for Ethical Government" who is a front group for a corporation who is fighting against ethics laws. Every campaign add should be required to clearly state "This add paid for by (name of person) in behalf of (name the corporation) who has a financial interest in the candidate / legislation being promoted."