4

Bad economy has pushed birth rate down

The slow economy has parents rethinking plans to expand their families.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Tess Vigeland: The recession has already changed where we live, what we do and what we buy. Now it's shrinking the size of the American family. At last check, the birth rate was the lowest it's been in 25 years.

Eliza Ronalds-Hannon reports on why more people aren't bringing up baby in the wake of the Great Recession.


Eliza Ronalds-Hannon: Have you ever thought about exactly how much it costs to raise a child? Or even just to give birth? Chana Wells has.

Chana Wells: Because I'm all about the numbers. My pregnancy cost about $15,000, all right. And that $15,000 is after insurance.

Her daughter's now 3 years old, and she's the only child for Chana and her husband, who live in Brooklyn.

Wells: I want my daughter to be able to have, at the very bare minimum, what I had. But I really want her to have way more. And so, let's say on average annually, we must have shelled out $45,000 on her.

That's a big price tag, especially for a family without a guaranteed income. Both Chana and her husband are self-employed. She owns a construction firm. He is a personal trainer. Together they made about $185,000 last year, and this year is going even better. But they know nothing is guaranteed.

Wells: There are ebbs and flows, sometimes we have it, sometimes, honestly, we don't. At this point I am not feeling like we'll be able to do that for another one. Jesus, how am I gonna come up with $40,000, you know?

To raise a child, not including the cost of college, the average American family spends nearly a quarter million dollars. Government figures say that cost has jumped 23 percent in the last 50 years, after controlling for inflation. That's largely because child care and health care costs.

Wells: She's very well-insured. We have none. It's very indicative of our time. That's the stuff they don't tell you.

Susan Newman: Nobody wants to put a price tag on children, but children are big-ticket items.

That's psychologist Susan Newman, and she says those costs don't stop at what you spend on the kid. Often, parenting also means sacrificing income.

Newman: And there's a distinct motherhood penalty. Mothers are taxed, so to speak, at 7 percent per child. That's what they're losing in income.

And for the women who put off motherhood for financial reasons, delaying a bigger family sometimes means foregoing one. That's what happened to Frances Janisch, a photographer in Manhattan.

Frances Janisch: We always just were waiting for the right time. And the right time would have been around when the recession started and we just decided to hold off.

Now, Frances is 42 years old. Her daughter is 5-and-a-half and knows she won't be getting a little brother or sister.

Janisch: I worry a lot about the fact that she doesn't have a sibling. I know that I always regret that I didn't have a second child. Um, I think I will regret that forever. But, as long as she's fine, it is just the way it is.

That's the way it is for a lot of families. Sociologists say that means there could be a bigger problem on the horizon. Fewer births today will mean fewer workers to support retirees in the future.

In New York, I'm Eliza Ronalds-Hannon for Marketplace.


Vigeland: We asked a simple question on our Facebook page this morning: When you think about having kids, what makes you think twice? Join our conversation. Share your thoughts on our Facebook page.

brighterfuture's picture
brighterfuture - Aug 26, 2012

No matter how little education a person has, he/she knows exactly how babies are conceieved, since childbirth has been happening since the beginning of time. Lack of education is not an excuse for continuing to reproduce when you can't afford to do so.

casp3pos's picture
casp3pos - Aug 26, 2012

"Sociologists say that means there could be a bigger problem on the horizon. Fewer births today will mean fewer workers to support retirees in the future."

Really? This seems to be the true challenge to economists, sociologists, and politicians. We need to find a way to support our social security system without resorting to constant population growth. The planet would do well to have 10% of its current population. I'm not suggesting that people die, just that fewer be born. Especially when we live in a society where robots and computers can perform increasingly complex tasks. Do we really need people to work at all to support retirees?

jesswondering's picture
jesswondering - Aug 24, 2012

I had the same thoughts! I was listening to this report while in the car this evening and simply could not relate to the mother interviewed. $45,000/year?! I can't imagine that we spend that much on our five children combined.... unless of course you include the larger home and car (and related expenses) - but with a single 3 year old you certainly wouldn't need either.

In our house we've hit economies of scale for the first several years with small children adding quite minimal marginal costs. The birth is probably $1500 out of pocket, diapers, clothing, toys handed down, child breastfed, tag-team parenting for care. Usually there is a new carseat (if not for the new child, then for a toddler who gets booted) and a few new fun things - but the additional costs for that entire first year (including the birth) would run less that $3000. I am honestly quite baffled at how one could spend $45,000 a year on a 3-yr old; unless NYC childcare costs are that outrageous (and they use said childcare).

Older children do cost more if one chooses to engage in multiple extra-curricular activities, but the research is certainly out on whether that is ultimately beneficial to the child - even if one can and chooses to afford participation.

Marketplace... the story would have been much more engaging if you had chosen an "average" family who delayed or avoided having children due to economic concerns... you know those families who make $45,000 for their entire income.

MotherLodeBeth's picture
MotherLodeBeth - Aug 24, 2012

Golly gee and yet the Amish, Mennonites, and other smart families earning well under 50k a year have more than one child and live well. Maybe just maybe some people don't realize a baby and even a toddler has few needs. Sleep, diaper, food and some attention. Not $200-300 diaper bags and strollers that cost as much as a down payment on a used small car.

You do not need an expensive stroller or other stuff they love to sell you. Buy clean good clothes at Kids Again and other consignment shops and thrift stores.Breastfeed rather than use formula. And stop spending so much stuff on toys! Use or start a lending toy library.

Is it just me or are some folks just plain spoiled and lacking in knowing the difference between a want and a need?