18

Corporate profits don't translate

Robert Reich

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Tess Vigeland: So there are signs of economic trouble -- namely in the job market. But corporate stocks had their best performance of the year in April. Profits are soaring.

So why hasn't that translated into more hiring? That's the question commentator Robert Reich's says we should be asking.


Robert Reich: First-quarter corporate profits are way up, as is the stock market. But the U.S. economy has slowed to a crawl -- a measly 1.8 percent annualized growth -- down from over 3 percent last quarter. Real wages are also down. And despite more jobs, the percent of working-age Americans actually working remains as low as it was in the depths of the recession.

How can big American corporations be doing so well and the economy so badly? Because their sales are booming -- abroad. And they're adding new jobs where their sales are.

Caterpillar, for example, is going gangbusters outside the U.S. -- and over the last year has added 12,000 workers abroad. But its domestic workforce remains below pre-recession levels.

Or look at GE, the bellwether of American corporations -- 60 percent of its business is now coming from outside the U.S. And that's where 54 percent of its employees are.

Almost half the sales of the S&P 500 are now overseas. The Commerce Department reports that in the past decade American multinationals have eliminated almost 3 million jobs in the U.S. while adding more than 2 million abroad.

So we've got big American corporations in a vigorous recovery that's raising stock prices -- while the U.S. economy languishes. Which raises some basic questions.

What is the American economy, and how is its success supposed to be measured?

And why should big U.S. corporations whose sales and employees and even investors are becoming more and more global, be called "American" companies, anyway?

And finally, why should the Supreme Court give these big global companies First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts of money on our elections?

You see, we're relying on our elected officials for policies that help create jobs with good wages here in America, which isn't exactly the objective of these global enterprises.


Vigeland: Robert Reich served as secretary of labor under President Clinton. His most recent book is called Next week, David Frum. Send us your comments -- click on the contact link.

About the author

Robert Reich is chancellor's professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton.

Pages

Raelene Gold's picture
Raelene Gold - May 4, 2011

Robert Reich as usually is to briefly summarize our nation's main problem. Where I am most people agree this is fundamental to most of our problems. The main question that is debated is do we revoke the Citizen's United decision by a constitutional amendment or is there another faster route.

Douglas Jones's picture
Douglas Jones - May 4, 2011

Robert Reich asked: ".., why should the Supreme Court give these big global companies First Amendment right to spend unlimited amounts of money on our elections?"

Why indeed? Only citizens may donate individually, but corporations are subject to no citizenship test. The Citizens United decision has created a preposterous situation that I'm certain that Congress never intended. If all of the beneficial owners of a corporation are citizens, perhaps the court's logic ought to allow the court to donate to campaigns, but certainly, nobody intended that the law permit corporations owned by non-citizens to donate when individual non-citizens are forbidden to do so.
The solution is obvious, either extend equal free-speech rights to all non citizens, or require corporations to restrict the citizenship of their shareholders before they are permitted to donate.

David Tiffany's picture
David Tiffany - May 4, 2011

US corporations are using the recession as an excuse to ship more jobs overseas where labor costs are lower. Simple as that.

Barry Miller's picture
Barry Miller - May 4, 2011

I can't believe it! I found myself agreeing with something Robert Reich said. Mr. Reich asks, “How can big American corporations be doing so well and the economy so badly? Because their sales are booming -- abroad. And they're adding new jobs where their sales are.” Well, that's the part we agree on. But the “basic” questions he then asks are the wrong basic questions. He concludes that if we can stop the corporations from donating so much to political campaigns and corrupting political policies, American jobs will sprout up. Wrong. I would ask these basic questions: First, why does the U.S. continue to have one of the highest corporate tax rates in the industrialized world? Second, why are U.S. companies double-taxed, having to pay tax in the country where they make the money, and also taxed in the U.S. when they bring it home to invest or pay dividends? These are two huge disincentives for U.S. companies to expand at home and repatriate funds to pay for any expansion. What's happening with corporate earnings and jobs has nothing to do with donations to politicians getting bought by companies who have foreign workers and stockholders. If we want U.S. corporations to grow their business in the U.S., give them an economic reason to do so.

Will Davenport's picture
Will Davenport - May 4, 2011

Thank you for pulling together a simple picture of why corporations should not influence politics.

http://corporatecoloringbook.com/

Lee Emery's picture
Lee Emery - May 4, 2011

You hit that one right on the head. I think your opinion is correct.

John Rowell's picture
John Rowell - May 4, 2011

Why not Alternative Minimum Tax on corporations, and other businesses, that have huge incomes and profits (like GE), but pay little or nothing in taxes.

Brian Lica's picture
Brian Lica - May 4, 2011

Robert Reich is an intellctual who is a patriot for the people and of the people.

Pages