4

Work benefits going down? Start saving more

Economics editor Chris Farrell

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

Tess Vigeland: There's a lot of talk these days -- not just in Wisconsin, but in states around the country -- about the need to tamp down on public employee wages and benefits. Part of an effort to close budget deficits. The public policy stakes are high. But commentator Chris Farrell says the debate carries a message for all of us.


Chris Farrell: Want to know my takeaway from the escalating turmoil over public employee benefits and contracts? Everybody just has to save more. A lot more -- say, at least 20 percent of your income.

Like it or not, it's the only conclusion from the ominous arithmetic of an aging population plus a fraying retirement savings system.

All over the country, governors and mayors are in a mud-wrestling match with public employees. There is a gap between pension assets and the benefits that were promised, which some -- like the folks at the Pew Research Center -- say could total at least $1 trillion.

The financial meltdown laid bare what many experts have long known: Too many state and local governments routinely underfunded their pension plans while hiking benefits. Going forward public plans, are going to get a lot less generous, especially for new hires.

But we're not just talking government plans here, either. Corporate America is facing its own crisis. Three decades after its launch, the 401(k) is falling far short of its promise of a safe, secure retirement. Despite strong gains in the stock market, retirement portfolios have been damaged by two bear markets and two recessions in less than a decade.

And if you're thinking you can always count on Social Security and Medicare -- forget it. As Republicans and Democrats battle over how to reduce the federal budget deficit, eventually, they'll get to Social Security and Medicare. The programs will be less generous.

Add it all up and it seems that all of us will have to save more for our old age. There are signs that we're on the right savings track. Government statisticians say the personal savings rate was above 5 percent at the end of last year; in 2005, it was less than 1 percent. And the Federal Reserve tells us that consumers have reduced their credit card debts by 16 percent from the 2008 peak. And lots of people managed to do it without a pay raise.

But it isn't enough. The new arithmetic of retirement is that we're going to work longer and save more. So, don't wait. Start now.


Vigeland: Chris Farrell is the economics editor for Marketplace.

About the author

Chris Farrell is the economics editor of Marketplace Money.
Roger Ouellette's picture
Roger Ouellette - Mar 1, 2011

Chris, your advice is dead-on straight. A person who saves modestly over the long haul (at varying percentages when conditions in one's circumstances change) can accumulate a tidy nest-egg.
Retirement saving isn't something that anyone can fix with "catch-up" contributions in their 50's -- by then, your mold has been cast.
There are young people who will start saving while they're still young because of what you say, or maybe because of what they'll see happening to those who waited too too long to spend less than what they made.

Patrice Monsour phd's picture
Patrice Monsour phd - Feb 27, 2011

Not all public employees need to work longer and save more. As a public university employee of 24 yrs, I have noticed that administrators quietly receive promotions and raises regardless of economic climate. Not to mention that they seem to breed like rabbits, while front-line professionals increasingly handle the
responsibilities of 2-3 jobs. I'd love to see you guys take a risk and dig a little deeper into this crisis. It's not a funding problem for state governments -- it's an allocation problem.

Tracy Johnson's picture
Tracy Johnson - Feb 26, 2011

My guess is that if we save 20% of our income, that leaves us with enough discretionary income to buy . . .NOTHING. So all the people whose jobs depend on us buying things would shortly be out of a job, unable to save anything.

Luana Conley's picture
Luana Conley - Feb 26, 2011

I just heard you recommend that we save more, that we can no longer rely on pensions, public or private, or Social Security/Medicare. SAVE WHAT?
Pray tell, with reduced earnings to the point of subsistence, no raises in 5 years, and imminent threats of layoff for this educated public employee at a CA university what have I left to save? My former savings and 401K were robbed by financial Simon Legrees who sneered at little investors like us while they gambled and hedged our savings. At this point, with many educated friends jobless, I can't afford regular auto maintenance, the vet, the co-pays, vacations, nothing. Workers have been screwed by the kleptocrats and the banksters, so your advice is ridiculous, and worse, blaming the victim for their own plight. Look out the window and see which way the wind blows before you give out more useless stupid advice like, "save your money."