24

Prioritizing which loans to pay off first

Dan Ariely, author of "Predictably Irrational"

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

Kai Ryssdal: Courtesy of the Federal Reserve, here's one of the upsides of a down economy. We are less comfortable spending money we don't have. The Fed says total consumer debt fell by more than $21 billion in July.

But even if we aren't adding to our debt, a good many of us still have a whole lot of bills at the end of each month. There's the mortgage, the car payment, maybe student loans and credit cards. That is a lot of red ink to deal with, which can make the decision of which bill to pay first daunting. Behavioral economist Dan Ariely has some insights. Dan, it's good to talk to you again.

DAN ARIELY: Same here.

Ryssdal: We all have debt, but it turns out you're about to tell us that we handle that debt differently, like from car loan to credit card to mortgage.

ARIELY: That's right. So recently one of the big banks came to have a chat with us. And one of the things they brought up was the question of how people decide what loans to pay back. You know, this is a time when people have lots of loans and different credit cards and so on, and if they try to pay them back what's first on the priority, what's second, and what's third. And of course, the bank really wants to figure this out. But it struck me as an interesting question as well.

So imagine the following. Imagine you have two credit card debts, one is for $10,000, one is for $4,000. The one that is for $10,00 you're paying 10 percent interest rate, the one that is $4,000 you pay 4 percent interest rate. Which one would you pay first?

Ryssdal: I'm going to pay down the $10,000 one because it's got the higher interest rate, and it's the larger principle.

ARIELY: That's right. And it seems quite trivial that that's what people should do.

Ryssdal: All right, just for the record I think that's the first time in one of your hypothetical studies that I've actually gotten the right answer. I'm just saying. Anyway, go ahead.

ARIELY: So it sounded quite a simple problem to solve. And we assumed initially that people would just get it right, but nevertheless we did an experiment. We gave people six different loans, that's varied on how much money they owed, and how big the loan was, and what was the interest rate. And people played this game over time, with 36 periods. And what we saw was that people overemphasized closing loans. So if you had four loans, and you could put some money into closing one of them, this was too tempting for people, and they did it very often. And they did it instead of putting the money where it could work the best.

Ryssdal: But obviously the banks realize this, right? They realize that it's in their interest to have consumers mismanage their debt.

ARIELY: This is actually very tricky whether banks want consumers to mismanage their debt or not. Because banks do want people to be late and make all kinds of mistakes. But they don't want them to declare bankruptcy. It's actually a delicate balance between the fact that banks want people to pay them a very high interest and penalty but not too much so that people have to declare bankruptcy, and your loan goes away.

Ryssdal: All right, so here comes what I imagine is the behavioral economics $64,000 question. Why don't we do the optimal thing when it comes to our debt?

ARIELY: So I think the problem is closing loans is tempting. I think people don't really compute the interest rate. And what they look at is how many loans they have. And because we overestimate this closing loans, we end up misallocating our money.

Ryssdal: Is there any way to fix that, though. What can be done?

ARIELY: So sadly you know from the hundreds of people that we've tested, there wasn't a single individual who knew the right strategy. Everybody made some mistake. One of the things you could suspect is maybe let's just teach people a simple rule about what they should be doing, but education has never really yielded positive result in the domain of financial literacy.

So instead what I think we could do is to think about mechanisms that could fix this problem. So, for example, imagine there was a central mechanism in which you could submit all your bills to, like a Web site, and you say here is what I owe, and here is the interest rate, and so on. You tell me what's the right allocation. Give me a recommendation of what's the right approach. And I think something like this could help.

Ryssdal: Dan Ariely teaches behavioral economics at Duke University. Dan, thanks a lot.

ARIELY: My pleasure.

Pages

Melisa Kennedy's picture
Melisa Kennedy - Oct 31, 2010

Thank you!

Lars Hedbor's picture
Lars Hedbor - Sep 18, 2009

I heard Professor Ariely's comment about his wish that there was a tool for consumers to use in making debt reduction decisions, and realized that I had the knowledge and ability to build such a tool.

Available at no cost, it's at www.whichdebtfirst.com. Enjoy!

David Rigby's picture
David Rigby - Sep 17, 2009

Those who point out important value in paying off any loan, no matter how low the interest rate, are correct. But each individual should make that decision, based on his/her own circumstances, examples of which are provided in some of the responses below.

Here is the extreme comparison, using the example given, assuming all monthly payments are $500. (Ignore any "minimum" payment.)
Alt.1. Assume all payments go to the $10K debt first and to the $4K debt after the former is paid off. Total $ paid is $15,359 over 31 payments.
Alt.2. Assume all payments go to the $4K debt first and to the $10K debt after the former is paid off. Total $ paid is $15,892 over 32 payments.
Alt 1 is "cheaper" than Alt 2 by $533.

Michael Dailey's picture
Michael Dailey - Sep 17, 2009

Another useful tool for considering the options: https://powerpay.org/

Trina Ingelfinger's picture
Trina Ingelfinger - Sep 16, 2009

The monthly payments on most loans (other than credit cards) won't be reduced by a partial pay off. So anyone who has a cash flow problem that they think (or hope) might improve over time, is acting rationally by paying off small debts. The debt burden won't be optimally reduced, but cash flow will be optimally increased. Penny wise and pound foolish has a certain appeal during a recession.

Brian Minter's picture
Brian Minter - Sep 15, 2009

People with high debt to income ratios will actually be more likely to survive an "event" that pushes them toward bankrupty or late payments or whatever. It is like insurance, pay a small fee now to be more likely to survive a larger "event". This assumes of course that paying off a card or loan does not then cause a celebration of charging the card back up.

Example: Assume that a person has $3000 a month to pay $2900 in bills $1000 of which is for 4 loans, and (1)can pay down one of four loans (highest interest loan) partially with some free'd up cash or (2)can pay one (lowest interest) off completely. Option 1 leaves the person with $2900 in bills next month and an expected $3000 in income. Option 2 leaves the person with $2750 in bills next month and an expected $3000.

Seems a no brainer to me that the "best insurance" against going bankrupt would be to reduce the monthly bills. That would leave more room for an unexpected event such as a flat tire that was destroyed to be replaced without then having to decide which bills not to pay.

Of course the philosophy of living paycheck to paycheck is not a smart idea, but we cannot ignore the fact that many either choose to or find themselves in this situation when something "unexpected" happens

Mark Singh's picture
Mark Singh - Sep 15, 2009

Dan Ariely's simplified view of this issue has led him to an incorrect conclusion. In a world where the only cost of a loan is interest it may be rational. The problem is that loan servicing companies have lots of interesting ways to add to your costs(unreasonable late fees, etc) A financial strategy that limits your exposure to those risks and their financial consequences can often be the most reasonable course of action. Just ask anyone who has had a credit card interest rate hike because they were late 2 days on a payment.

Elisabeth Daley's picture
Elisabeth Daley - Sep 15, 2009

I really think you two missed the point on why people want to pay off a debt, even if it is at a higher rate. If you have no money, or not enough money, or you expect your income to cease or decrease in the near future, you want to pay off one card so as to reduce the number of payments and the total minimum payment amount. Apparently neither of you has ever had to actually deal with more bills than available funds. Not everyone is eligible to be bailed out by the US taxpayers.

Paula Jones's picture
Paula Jones - Sep 15, 2009

Jimmy Chooo, you speak like a true Vulcan who has never had substantial debt. Live long and prosper, my friend.

Bruce Watson's picture
Bruce Watson - Sep 15, 2009

Prof Ariely is looking for a tool to help rationalize the loan payoff decision. There is a Mac program called "Debtinator" which does that and also helps to track the loans and expenses. http://www.bassetsoftware.com/osx/debtinator/

Pages