2

OnStar backs down on decision to track former customers

OnStar button in a car.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

Jeremy Hobson: The General Motors-owned OnStar car communication service that's designed to help drivers in an emergency had a little emergency of its own last week. It said it would collect information on its customers' driving habits -- things like speed and location -- even if drivers cancelled the service. Well now, after consumer outrage, OnStar is hitting the brakes on that plan.

For more, we'll get the details now from our New York bureau chief, Heidi Moore. She's with us live. Good morning.

Heidi Moore: Good morning.

Hobson: So first tell us how this controversy started?

Moore: Sure. Well, drivers know OnStar because it's a service you sign up for that can track your location and your speed. And it can help you out when you're in an accident, or if there's another kind of an emergency, like a weather emergency. So what happened is, OnStar said that it would continue to provide those services -- even if you cancelled. Well -- that's a problem.

Hobson: It certainly is. I mean, there's been a lot of outcry over this. Is that why GM and OnStar decided to reverse course here?

Moore: Yes. It's creepy, not to put too fine a point on it. I talked to Chris Hoofnagle, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley. This is what he said about it.

Chris Hoofnagle: New technologies enable all sorts of exciting features. But if these technologies are used a little differently by people with perhaps a malicious purpose, these technologies can really become implements of surveillance or control of individuals.

So what that tells us is that when something like this happens, it impacts how much consumers trust a company. It becomes very difficult to give them your money -- to give them your service -- if this is going to be the way that you're going to be treated in return. And it pulls the veil back on the friendly face of a company -- you see how the sausage is made, and it can freak people out.

Hobson: Marketplace's New York bureau chief Heidi Moore -- thanks, Heidi.

Moore: Thank you, Jeremy.

John Thompson's picture
John Thompson - Sep 29, 2011

The electronic control modules of modern cars already store information related to events right up to the point of an accident - speed, braking, whether the anti-lock braking system was engaged, airbag deployment, and accelerometer values if a sensor is available. This has been done for at least a decade, and yes, this information is routinely reviewed by insurance companies. The trend now from insurers is to offer discounts to allow them to install "readers" that track this information on an ongoing basis - I'm sure you've seen the ads on TV.

All the OnStar information would give insurance companies over what they already have is location, heading and the route you've taken. I think the outcry is the notion of the "real time" aspect of the monitoring - this level of surveillance is inappropriate especially if you specifically opt out of this by not activating the OnStar service.

One thing that I'm surprised no one has mentioned is that you can physically remove the OnStar equipment. If you're truly paranoid - that would solve your problem. Just go to a Car Audio store and ask!

Michael Parker's picture
Michael Parker - Sep 28, 2011

This seems to bring up more questions than answers. We have an On-Star equipped vehicle. The service has never been activated. Have be been "tracked"? Even if not, is the information being recorded in the vehicle? Were there an accicent, could vehicle speed and location records be subpoena'd by an insurance company or trial lawyer?