11

Here come the pitchforks

The level of public outrage over Wall Street's shenanigans has not abated. In fact today, Gawker announced the Goldman Sachs Project, asking people to report any excessive spending by Goldman employees.

From Gawker:

Are you Facebook friends with a Goldmanite who just posted photos of his lavish bachelor party? Post them to our fancy new tag page, #GoldmanProject, or e-mail them to us. Are you a realtor who just sold a $4 million duplex a Goldman banker? Is your ex-boyfriend Goldman banker planning a year-end trip to Cabo to blow his bonus wad? Shoot us an e-mail...

If this sounds like a creepy exercise in crowd-sourced surveillance to you, understand that we're not looking interested in digging up private details about private citizens. We just want to catalog how are tax dollars have been spent, and see where $23 billion goes. If Goldman's employees earned those bonuses, they should spend them with pride. Own it.

Actually it does sound a bit creepy, but more to the point, what does it accomplish? The rage is understandable, but shouldn't it be directed toward the people who made this possible? I haven't heard of anyone rounding up Internet search parties to demand that Congress break up these companies or fix TBTF.

One commenter put it like this:

Targeting the kids at Goldman for bottle service is the exact ... equivalent of picking a random orgy participant in ancient Rome and calling him responsible for the Nero fire.

Your opinion?

About the author

Pages

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous - Oct 15, 2009

Goldman has become the foremost symbol of the robber class, so I don't think its unfair to scrutinize its employees. The American people have been robbed, and its much different to pick on an accessory to a robbery than to pick on a orgy participant. Their orgy costs us dearly. Tracking Goldmanites lavish expenses will keep the public outraged, and a vigilent public will be better able to fight the next attempts to transfer its wealth to the robber class.

Beverly's picture
Beverly - Oct 17, 2009

how about following the elected officials who rubber stamped the bail-out packages?

Surely a Congress that doesn't enjoy the same retirement plans as JoeTP should be held accountable?

Dan's picture
Dan - Oct 16, 2009

Ruling against every imaginable abuse in advance of its commission, and blaming the regulators absolves the criminal of their crime. When my kid says "you didn't say I couldn't flush it down the toilet", we both know his argument sucks.
I reject any suggestion that people either didn't know right from wrong.

Ned D.'s picture
Ned D. - Oct 16, 2009

Congress should just levy a little extra tax against profits above a certain level in banks that received bailout money.

When the money is repaid, the tax disappears.

scott 's picture
scott - Oct 16, 2009

i think we need a list of the names and addresses with personal information of all those involved in these absurd financial games so that we can shadow, heckle them and make their lives miserable. send them to china

Ἱερώνυμος Αματι Nώνυμος's picture
Ἱερώνυμ... - Oct 21, 2009

"
Congress that doesn’t enjoy the same retirement plans
"

Boys will be boys. That said, this is hardly the time to rob Fort Knox. There are lot of people under investigation. Sit back, relax, and enjoy when they are harvested.

Enjoy
!

Jim's picture
Jim - Oct 15, 2009

The price of unrestrained and unchecked capitalism. The rich get richer and the poor have to pay! We should be happy! Remember what Greenspan told us, "Americans have become far better off with all the growth and prosperity" I really worry about the future generations and how they will see us. I can see it now, "To the bastille!"

JPM's picture
JPM - Oct 16, 2009

I think "The price of unrestrained and unchecked Government. The rich get richer and the poor have to pay." makes more sense.

Ned D.'s picture
Ned D. - Oct 16, 2009

The rich are now using the government to get richer at the expense of the poor. Whether it's war contracts or contracts for hazardous disaster trailers or tax cuts or degregulation or bailouts.

JPM's picture
JPM - Oct 19, 2009

But isn't that the fault of the government? Opposite from what Moore would like to think, the problem isn't capitalism but rather the government that is giving way.

Pages