7

GM boggles the mind

It's hard to comprehend what's happening with this car company. I don't know what's going on behind closed doors, but to the public, the outcome of this bankruptcy appears ominous: Soon, the government will be the controlling stakeholder in GM. The UAW isn't signaling much faith in the company's future value. And the bondholders who kept the company alive are getting fleeced.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the government is likely putting up to $50 billion in new money to support GM's bankrutpcy. That means taxpayers are getting a much bigger chunk, when the UAW is agreeing to a smaller stake (17.5% instead of 39%). From the Journal:

Remember that the union just agreed to take a relatively small portion of its health-care trust in GM equity. The rest will be funded via annual payments on preferred stock. In other words, UAW's view of the future is clear: Cash today over equity value tomorrow.

As for bondholders, they've rejected the government's offer of a 10% stake. You might read GM Bondholders Are People Like You and Me, also from the Journal:

First, let's set the record straight about who owns GM's bonds. We are hardworking families, individual investors and retirees who purchased billions of these bonds in $25, $50 and $100 increments. Many bonds were bought directly and others are held in our pension funds, 401(k) plans and other retirement programs.

We are not an unreasonable group. We understand that to save GM everyone will need to endure economic pain. But we are very troubled by the government's decision to give UAW retirees -- equal members, with the bondholders, of the unsecured creditor class -- preferential treatment. The government cannot be permitted to rewrite bankruptcy rules on a whim to selectively benefit equal groups.

Why would these private investors ever put their money into a company like GM again? I don't blame them for rejecting the government's puny offer, but I'm not sure they're going to get a better deal in bankruptcy. Yeah, it's supposedly up to a bankruptcy judge, but this is looking like a "government-managed" bankruptcy where the pieces are already in place. GM, and by that I mean Government Motors, wants to have this thing wrapped up within a month.

Hopefully, the bankruptcy judge will put the company through its paces, instead of letting the government dictate the terms. But my confidence level isn't very high.

The government obviously believes it can turn GM around through this reorganization. Maybe it can. Maybe that equity stake will be a huge windfall for taxpayers down the road.

But what do you think will happen?

About the author

franchesco teratoma's picture
franchesco teratoma - May 27, 2009

neither american political party can bee seen to let gm fail and thus have tens of thousands of people lose their jobs in states like michican and ohio.

gm has been a lousy company for decades and has let the uaw bleed them dry. what has changed is people like my papa no longer buy buicks exclusively.

this is politics plain and simple. just like all those decades when the government and the big three were afraid to take on the unions.

JM's picture
JM - May 27, 2009

So is this an example of a politician buying votes? If so, this is very dangerous territory.

James A. Young's picture
James A. Young - May 27, 2009

I'm just about sick of hearing about GM. It irks me no end that the taxpayers are about to shove another $50 billion just so they can keep making their crappy cars and obnoxious commercials.

I understand the potential pitfalls of GM going kaput, but the whole company hierarchy needs to be held accountable for the mess they're in. Instead, we're rewarding them with more money than sense.

Peter DuDeck's picture
Peter DuDeck - May 29, 2009

<B>VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUNT THE WARRANTS</B>

Assuming there are still 610 million shares outstanding of common stock, the $15 and $30 billion market cap that would trigger the warrants mean you would be "allowed" to buy ("exercise") shares at $25 & $50 per share.

Not "be issued", but "ALLOWED TO BUY" shares of the new, smaller GM at $25 (last seen in 2007) and $50 (last seen in 2004) per share. This does not sweeten any deal that I can comprehend.

RLA's picture
RLA - May 29, 2009

This is the biggest fleecing of GM bondholders in American history. The government is running the show and selectively deciding who gets "screwed" in the deal. It is crystal clear who the government favors and it "Ain't the bondholders who LOANED GM billions of dollars at at fixed price, for a fixed rate over a fixted period of time. Obama won't even let the bondholders come to the table - just another bureaucratic disaster! The word for a 363 bankruptcy if "Cramed" down the bondholders throats.

Robert Carson's picture
Robert Carson - May 27, 2009

I question the need to support GM as it transfers American jobs to China and walks away from the American economy. Why should we bail out another Chinese automaker? Maybe we should call GM by its new name, Guangdong Motors.

Sue's picture
Sue - May 30, 2009

I am a main street GM bondholder who did not
have the availability of a 401(K) in my job
and attempted to establish some financial se-
curity. The latter has now been ruined.

I totally agree with RLA's response. Among
other nefarious things, this deal with the
UAW is a "pay for play" scheme that deserves
to be investigated by a special prosecutor
and be heard by the Supreme Court. The
entire scheme is morally and ethically out-
rageous.