15

Dissing the American dream

The Wall Street Journal has an interesting piece about people in a California suburb walking away from their mortgages and renting instead. The article suggests that bailing on a mortgage, while a negative hit on the old credit score, might be good for the economy.

The story features two homeowners who've discovered that "giving up on the American dream has its benefits:"

Both now live on the 3100 block of Club Rancho Drive in Palmdale, where a terrible housing market lets them rent luxurious homes -- one with a pool for the kids, the other with a golf-course view -- for a fraction of their former monthly payments.

"It's just a better life. It really is," says Ms. Richey. Before defaulting on her mortgage, she owed about $230,000 more than the home was worth.

Palmdale is about as suburban as you can get. It's a collection of homes in the high-desert 50 miles northeast of LA. The streets have names like Avenue N-8.

While perhaps morally questionable, what these people are doing is perfectly legal in California. In fact, California is one of several states in which lenders can't go after other assets of defaulters. And the Journal suggests that if all American homeowners at least three months behind on their mortgages just simply walked away, it could provide a bigger boost for the economy than all the tax breaks in the government's stimulus package:

"It's a stealth stimulus," says Christopher Thornberg of Beacon Economics, a consulting firm specializing in real estate and the California economy. "The quicker these people shed their debts, the faster the economy is going to heal and move forward again..."

Some are leaving behind their homes and mortgages right away, while others are simply halting payments until the bank kicks them out. That's freeing up cash to use in other ways.

Ms. Richey's family of five used some of the money to buy season tickets to Disneyland, and plans to take a Carnival cruise to Mexico in March. Mr. Fernandez takes his girlfriend out to dinner more frequently. "We're saving lots of money," Ms. Richey says.

That's not going over very well with some of her neighbors:

Tom Sobelman, whose family of four lives across the street from Ms. Richey... argues that people who choose to default are unfairly benefiting at the expense of taxpayers, who have put trillions of dollars at risk to bail out struggling banks. "All these people are gaming the system, and I'm paying for it," he says. "My kids are going to be paying it off."

Elsewhere, homeowners in some Atlanta suburbs are upset that the county government won't lower their home appraisals to match the market value. The Journal-Constitution has a special report:

To Donald Strohmeyer of Duluth, county assessments are a joke. In 2001, he bought his 7,000-square-foot Sugarloaf home as an investment property.

In 2006, the 74-year-old retired executive shelled out $10,108.39 in property taxes. This year, despite the unprecedented decline in real estate values, his property tax assessment was only 33 cents lower.

"To say there's been no change in the assessed value is kind of ridiculous," he said. "They are just going to eat up whatever they can. They're going to build stadiums for the Braves and monuments to their own stupidity. There's really nothing you can do."


Well apparently, you can give up, rent a nice home with a pool and buy season tickets to Disneyland.

About the author

Pages

Darlene's picture
Darlene - Dec 11, 2009

One item which isn't mentioned - I wonder how many of those people would have walked away if their lender had been willing to modify their mortgage?

A report I heard this morning mentioned that Bank of America had modified *less than 100* mortgages! And there are over *170,000* people trying to get their mortgages modified with Bank of America.

I think the Making Home Affordable program was a complete flop. Why? Because the banks don't want to play and there's no way to force them to play. I wish the government would tackle <b>that</b> problem.

gb gb's picture
gb gb - Dec 11, 2009

Most of the mortgages are not owned by banks. They just originated them. These loans are owned by investers such as pension funds that provide fixed income for grandmas and grandpas.

Why should these grandmas suffer for the mistakes of borrowers. Somebody has the bear the loss when a loan is modified. You are sadly mistaken if you think bank is bearing that loss.

The problem that need to be solved is to normalize the housing costs to what the incomes can support. And that is painful. That was you get for blowing bubbles. In a span a 10 years there were two bubbles and now FED is following exactly same policies that created those bubbles. This time the bubble is in govt DEBT. FED is artificially holding long term interest rates by buing the treasuries. So the feed back loop is broken and govt debt is massively expanding. When govt DEBT bubble bursts dollar will be worth less because they are going to print massive amounts of money.

George Bailey's picture
George Bailey - Dec 10, 2009

What has happened in our culture, when it is ok to (often) do something you know won't work out, walk away from your problem, then blame others? And it's not just home mortgages... it's student loans, car loans, promises we don't/ won't keep.

We can't completely lay this off on the lenders or their agents. Stupidity and greed factor into it, in many cases.

The rest of us who were responsible and kept our promises are now cleaning the mess up and paying for the freeloaders' mistakes.

Kate's picture
Kate - Dec 10, 2009

The problem is they're not "stickin' it to the man" - they're stickin' it to all of us who honor our debts. Believe me, we don't have a nice warm feeling about it.

I really fear for this country if everyone starts to behave as though all contracts have an implied "if it doesn't inconvenience you" clause in them.

don meinshausen's picture
don meinshausen - Dec 10, 2009

<i>I really fear for this country if everyone starts to behave as though all contracts have an implied “if it doesn’t inconvenience you” clause in them.</i><p>
Just look at as a no-fault divorce from reality or you could say it's a mortgagee's: "right to choose" or how about this: it's a same sex mortgage in which each party scr...<br>...well never mind.<p>
Here in Kentucky I had a neighbor walk away from a mortgage that was cheaper than his subsequent rent. That's not just immoral. That is absurdly immoral.<p>
Psalm 15<br>

1 Lord, who shall abide in thy tabernacle? who shall dwell in thy holy hill?<br>

2 He that walketh uprightly, and worketh righteousness, and speaketh the truth in his heart.<br>

3 He that backbiteth not with his tongue, nor doeth evil to his neighbour, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour.<br>

4 In whose eyes a vile person is contemned; but he honoureth them that fear the LORD. <b>He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.</b><br>

5 He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these things shall never be moved.

Michael's picture
Michael - Dec 10, 2009

Ha ha ha! Maybe the lord will pay my mortgage?

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous - Dec 11, 2009

<i>Ha ha ha! Maybe the lord will pay my mortgage?</i>
<p>
Why funny you should mention that:<p>

Job 19:25<br>
For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:<br>
Psalm 4:2<br>O ye sons of men, how long will ye turn my glory into shame? how long will ye love vanity, and seek after leasing? Selah.<br>

Matthew 6:12<br>
And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.<br>
John 14:2<br>
In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.<br>

<p>I could go on and on. Suffice to say:
He has paid my death obligation. Salvation is the ultimate bailout. Hell is the ultimate bankruptcy. And only the Lord is too big to fail. <p>
I pray that He does pay your mortgage. Merry Christmas!

Sean Kelly's picture
Sean Kelly - Dec 10, 2009

An unmentioned advantage of this approach is warm feeling one derives from stickin' it to the man.

Could "Stickin' it to the Man" be a future segment on Marketplace? Let us hope so...

Eric Roth's picture
Eric Roth - Dec 10, 2009

Illuminating.

While I have heard of some families dumping their homes, I'm surprised that some economists - and someone at the Journal - believes this trend will help the economy. Surprising - and slightly puzzling.

As ever, numbers add precision. The post would have been stronger with a layer of factual information and statistics to go along with the vivid examples.

Thank you.

Scott Jagow's picture
Scott Jagow - Dec 10, 2009

Eric, the Journal does have some numbers in the story, from data provider LPS Applied Analytics. The added cash flow from all Americans that haven't paid their mortgage in 3 months equals about $5 billion a month, which it says long-term could be worth more than the tax breaks in the stimulus plan.

Pages