Justin Timberlake concert sold out? Blame ticket bots

To free up tickets for concerts and sporting events, California is the latest state to ban ticket bot programs.

Buying a concert ticket online isn’t easy these days.

Imagine you're a Justin Timberlake fan and he's coming to your town. You set an alarm so that as soon as tickets go on sale, you log in to Ticketmaster -- with dreams of dancing in the aisles to your favorite JT tune -- only to find out tickets are already sold out.

You could turn to a site like StubHub and get seats, but those tickets might cost three times the face value.

It’s a story that California State Assemblyman Richard Pan, a Democrat from Sacramento, has heard many times.

"You know when the tickets are going on sale, and you log on a minute later and they're all gone. That’s extremely frustrating," Pan says.

Pan authored a bill banning the use of automated ticket bot programs in California. Bots digitally jump to the front of the line and scoop up all the tickets before regular fans have a shot at buying any.

Ticket bots are active across the country, and about a dozen states have laws trying to limit their abuse.

Smith College economics professor Andrew Zimbalist says bot programs are sophisticated. And, a ticket bot doesn’t just immediately re-sell the tickets. Instead, it holds on to tickets for awhile to maximize value.

"It can sell those tickets at its leisure," Zimbalist says. "If it tried to sell all of the tickets at once it might drive the price down. But, if it sells them slowly over time, it can maintain a higher price."

There’s a question as to whether ticket bot laws can actually help consumers, according to Chris Grimm of Fan Freedom, a national organization that advocates for ticket buyers. "The big problem with the law is that it doesn’t really have any way for the authorities to really get the information that they need to prosecute folks," Grimm says. 

Grimm thinks the law is a step in the right direction, but he doubts it will result in many criminal charges.

"We would have liked to have seen a requirement that ticket-sellers have to report evidence of bot use to the proper authorities, so they can go after and prosecute these bad actors," Grimm says.

Using ticket bots is now a misdemeanor in California. Ticketmaster and StubHub both supported the law, but in the battle of man versus machine, it’s likely the bots will continue evolving. And states will have to change laws to keep up.

About the author

Katie Orr is the state government reporter for Capital Public Radio in Sacramento, CA.
Log in to post5 Comments

Are the bots solving the CAPTCHAs or do the scalpers use humans for that?

Doesn't the huge spread between the face-value price and the scalper price mean the promoters and performers are leaving a lot of money on the table? I'd hate to see ticket prices go up, but it seems the secondary market has already caused the price to rise.

If ticket sellers used dynamic auction pricing then the motivation to deploy the ticket bots would go away. Imagine if fans had to bid on seats - this would put the ticket scalpers out of business. If there's no markup to be made then there's no point to create bots to scoop up the tickets. The extra cost would hopefully go to the performer, not a middleman.

...and as for me and my friend, well, bots got the best of us."
I am sure that Katie Orr is a good reporter. I thought her story was very interesting and I appreciated the personal anecdote about buying tickets. But, once I heard her say the sentence above, her credibility shrunk. On the other hand, is it now OK to write or say ME and my friend or ME and whoever? What happened to my friend and I? Did that grammar rule disappear when I wasn't looking or listening? Thanks for your input.

"I" would not be correct in this context. If you got rid of "my friend," it would never read as "...and as for I..." However, "me" should always come after "my friend." So, it should have read "...my friend and me..."

It is a fantasy to think regulation will allow the average person to purchase tickets at a reasonable price. The author herself stated that the tickets she bought from the reseller was "worth every penny". In the end, we pay what we're willing to pay. The real issue is who is getting the proceeds. Performers, venues, labels, promoters, and government are all fighting for their piece of the pie. This has been a problem since the 70s when I was young. I tend to believe that a larger reason for sparse ticket availability is "hold-backs" (http://nypost.com/2013/05/31/why-cant-you-score-concert-tix-maybe-becaus...). I’d love to see some real investigative journalism on that story, but that’s unlikely to happen.

With Generous Support From...