24

Frum: Banks are OK, but who cares?

Commentator David Frum.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF COMMENTARY

[CORRECTION 9/16/10: David Frum's commentary about voters blaming President Obama and other politicians for a bank bailout that he believes saved the financial system omitted when the TARP lending program to banks began. It began before President Obama took office and has continued under his administration.]

Kai Ryssdal: With the primaries last night, we are now basically set for the fall elections. We know who's going to be running against whom. And we know what we're in for: Weeks of campaign ads about the direction of the country, how to bring back jobs and what to do to fix the economy.

Commentator David Frum has some observations about that intersection of politics and the economy.


David Frum: In the first days of the Obama Administration, early in 2009, an important decision had to be made. America's banks had racked up $1.5 trillion in losses during the financial crises -- more than their combined total capital. The banks were bankrupt.

Some economists argued that the best choice was to follow the example of Sweden in the 1990s: The government should nationalize all the banks, sift through the wreckage, transfer bad assets to a single government-owned "bad bank," and then return the cleaned-up banks to private ownership.

This option was shot down by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and economic adviser Larry Summers. They advocated government help to recapitalize the banks without taking them into government ownership. And that is what happened.

The private banking sector has now recovered its profitability. It is rebuilding its reserves, and the banks have repaid most of the TARP loans they received from the government.

Everybody happy? Far from it. The TARP bailout may have averted a global depression, but it violated just about every idea of fair play. Voters don't care that things might have been worse; you get no marks in politics for beating the spread. Dissatisfied voters seem almost certain to administer severe punishment to the administration in November.

Bailouts have become poison for Republicans too. In Utah, Republican Senator Bob Bennett lost his party's nomination in large part because of his vote for the TARP bailout.

You can save the world -- but still lose your job.

Politicians will learn different lessons from this story. Some will learn: Don't stick your neck out for anybody. But there's another possible lesson too: We're all headed to retirement sooner or later, whether we like it or not. It's not a bad thing to be able to tell your fellow retirees that you did something big and important during your time on the job.

Ryssdal: David Frum spent time writing speeches for President George W. Bush. He's now the editor of Frum Forum. Next week in the rotation, Robert Reich is back.

Pages

Jonathan Lovelace's picture
Jonathan Lovelace - Sep 15, 2010

The lesson that politicians *should* learn is that it's their job to uphold the Constitution and serve their constituents, not to protect people or even the economy as a whole from the consequences of their bad choices.

Justin Morgan's picture
Justin Morgan - Sep 15, 2010

The TARP program was passed on October 3, 2008 and signed by President George W Bush. There is absolutely no way that David Frum, a former speechwriter for Bush, would not know this. Yet he implies that it was the plan of the Obama administration, and that voters will punish the Democrats for this in November. It is stunning to me that Marketplace would allow such a politically motivated false story to run on air.

I expect a retraction to be placed on this website story and to be read on air to clarify this misstatement.

In the future, when partisan political commenters present themselves as neutral economic reporters on Marketplace, maybe you should check the facts a bit more closely.

Bill Murray's picture
Bill Murray - Sep 15, 2010

Frum is still a political flack with an annoying habit of "misstating" facts, such as TARP being enacted by Obama. Between him and "technically true but collectively nonsense" McArdle you are really letting Marketplace listeners down. If we really wanted spin, we could listen to Faux news.

Sherry Wise's picture
Sherry Wise - Sep 15, 2010

I am very upset that you allowed
David Frum to imply that the TARP was begun by the Obama adminstration. The man worked for the Bush administration under which TARP was developed! He may be an editorialist, but don't you vet his statements for factual errors or lies by omission? You are allowing the political right to bulldoze over you like every other major media establishment. This is exactly the reason so many people don't believe in evolution, climate change, or even the fact that Obama is not a Muslim. Shame on you!!! From now on, I will listen to something on the way home from work that is less frustrating--like the sounds of being stuck in traffic. On second thought, anybody have a screaming baby I can listen to?

Pages