Economy needs more stimulus money

Justin Wolfers

TEXT OF COMMENTARY

Kai Ryssdal: Here's the quote of the day, courtesy of Warren Buffet on Good Morning America this morning. Talking about the prospects for a second economic stimulus plan, the legendary investor said, and I quote: "Our first stimulus bill was sort of like taking half a tablet of Viagra and having also a bunch of candy mixed in." More than you wanted to imagine about the economy, perhaps. But a lot of people, many of them in Congress, are opposed to the idea of more stimulus. Commentator and economist Justin Wolfers says the naysayers couldn't be more wrong.


JUSTIN WOLFERS: You'll hear plenty of arguments against another round of fiscal stimulus. But they are all wrong.

First, some say that we should let the current stimulus run its course. But if a pretty bad economy called for a pretty big stimulus, then a really bad economy calls for a really big stimulus. And we now have a really bad economy.

Even if the first stimulus package works exactly as planned, unemployment will probably rise above 10%. If we knew in January what we know now, we would have done more. And we still can.

Second, some forecasters argue that we are close to the turning point. I'm not convinced. But even if these sunny projections are right, they still suggest the economy will underperform for another three or four years. Fiscal policy can help close that gap.

Third, some argue that the original stimulus didn't work, and so we shouldn't try more. But it's way too early to tell. And we don't know how much worse it would have been without the stimulus. A disappointing couple of months can't overturn decades of evidence that government spending stimulates the economy.

Fourth, there are very real concerns about the deficit. But a well-designed stimulus means more government investment today and less tomorrow. It may even be cheaper for the government to invest today, when the economy has some slack and wages are low.

Our biggest economic risk isn't the deficit, but the risk of doing too little to kick start the economy. There remains the risk of deflation, which could further stall economic growth. There's also the possibility that if unemployment remains high enough for long enough, it may become institutionalized.

If a generation comes to think of unemployment insurance as an alternative to work, or if they lose skills, hope, and connections, unemployment could remain high for a generation. Sound familiar? Europe spent the past 30 years recovering from just this outcome. The United States can't afford that risk.

The best argument for another fiscal stimulus is that doing too little may be far worse than doing too much.

RYSSDAL: Justin Wolfers teaches business and public policy at The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Comments

I agree to American Public Media's Terms and Conditions.
With Generous Support From...