1

Calculating the costs of flight delays

Passengers wait in line for delayed flights.

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF STORY

JEREMY HOBSON: So, the other day when I flew from my home in New York
out here to Marketplace Headquarters in L.A. We got stuck on the tarmac for a while at JFK. Big surprise. But it turns out we can now put a price tag on flight delays. The cost is more than $32 billion dollars a year. Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman joins us now live with the details. Good morning, Mitchell.

MITCHELL HARTMAN: Good morning, Jeremy.

HOBSON: So who came up with this and how did they come up with this precise figure -- $32.9 billion?

HARTMAN: Researchers at U.C. Berkeley working for the Federal Aviation Administration added up all the costs that pile on with a flight delay. So let's say you're sitting on the tarmac, you're not flying to O'Hare or LAX. There's the value of your time -- you're waiting, you're not working. There's more time wasted if you miss a connection, let's say buying an expensive airport lunch, maybe a hotel room. The cost just to passengers totals nearly $17 billion.

HOBSON: So that's $17 billion. We talked about that $32 billion. Where does the rest of it come from?

HARTMAN: Airlines lose about $8 billion a year -- that's extra fuel, paying the crew, wear-and-tear on their equipment. They also don't schedule as many flights because they know that some airports and some routes are prone to delays. Then there's another $4 billion in lost demand -- this is people deciding to drive, maybe take the train, not go anywhere at all because airport delays are such a hassle. All this delay makes business less efficient. It shaves about $4 billion off of Gross Domestic Product. May sound like a lot, though U.S. GDP totals more than $14 trillion.

HOBSON: All right. Marketplace's Mitchell Hartman, thanks so much.

HARTMAN: You're welcome.

David Rigby's picture
David Rigby - Oct 19, 2010

"They also don't schedule as many flights because they know that some airports and some routes are prone to delays." I hope the "researchers" see the flaw in this logic: if the airport is prone to delays, then there isn't any lost revenue (or profit) because there are too many flights at that airport.