Apple's tech goes suburban

Apple's Steve Jobs unveils the iPhone at Macworld 2007.


Kai Ryssdal: It's going to be a couple of weeks yet before we see the newest version of the iPhone -- Apple aficionados are waiting with bated breath, I'm sure -- but for more people who are concerned with what's cool on the inside than how something looks, the Apple brand's a little less cool than it used to be.

Commentator Jonathan Zittrain explains.

Jonathan Zittrain: In 1977, a 21-year-old Steve Jobs unveiled the Apple II PC. For the first time, in a convenient single plastic-molded case, there was a device that you could take home to give you... a blinking cursor. But you could write programs to make it do whatever you wanted and run programs written by others. After two guys unrelated to Apple invented VisiCalc, the first spreadsheet, sales of Apples skyrocketed and Apple didn't even know why.

In 1984, Jobs gave us the Mac, the first PC that didn't act like a build-your-own Heathkit. Gone was the blinking cursor; turn on the Mac and it smiled at you! But it still ran code from anywhere. It could still surprise us.

Now fast forward to 2007. Jobs puts forward the iPhone. It's gorgeous, it's versatile, it's intuitive -- it's more Mac than a Mac. But it will not run just any outside code. Outsiders can't just send the next VisiCalc to iPhone owners directly. Instead, proposed new software must go through the centralized iPhone Apps store. Apple takes a cut of each piece of software sold and reserves the right to kill any app it doesn't like. Limits so far? Piracy, porn, bandwidth hog and "unforeseen." No more surprises.

As goes the iPhone, so goes the world. Nerds of today are coding for cool but tethered gizmos like the iPhone and Web 2.0 platforms like Facebook and Google Apps. All of these platforms are attractive, but they naturally keep control in the hands of the platform maker in a way that the famously proprietary Bill Gates never achieved with Windows.

You might think that's not so bad, but there's something precious about that plastic-molded case, the blinking cursor that says anything is not only possible, but likely. Thanks to our own tastes, similar to those that prefer Wal-Mart to the local general store, the Wild West IT landscape is, sadly, going suburban for most of us.

That's a future I hope we can still avoid.

Ryssdal: Jonathan Zittrain is the co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School. His new book is called "The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It."

Log in to post2 Comments

Jonathan Zittrain is correct is his criticism of the means which Apple is using with the iPhone (and which many mobile phone companies are using with WindowsMobile based devices), limiting the phone owner's ability to use their phones as they see fit. These "only approved (Apple) / signed (Microsoft) software" rules do in some practical ways constrain the creativity which led to the amazing Internet and digital world in which we live today. What Mr Zittrain misses is the fact that it takes only hours (or at most days) after such devices are released for people to break those chains and release the flexibility and creativity of these amazing mobile devices.
What Apple, the US mobile phone companies (which network lock the phones they sell), and while we're at it the digital media industry which is still deep in its misguided love affair with Digital Restrictions Management, all need to realize, is that technology simply will not stop creativity. They should stop fighting that creativity (at the cost of creating scofflaws who might otherwise have simply bought media, and at the cost of reducing sales of devices by reducing availability of amazing stuff). Instead, they should welcome that creativity, and offer the purchasers of these devices a straightforward option "safe mode or creativity mode"?
We do in practice have both today - with delays, nuisances, and reduction in the commercial potential of these devices due to the short-sighted actions of these companies. Let's have both - the creativity we have anyway (with less trouble), and the commerce we should have (with less argument).
Keep the faith Jonathan, and complete your argument!
Jay Libove, CISSP, CIPP
Atlanta, GA, US and Barcelona, Spain

I have no doubt that Zittrain is sincere, but he seems to have the typical Harvard olympian viewpoint.

I just wants something that doesn't require a manual, that is easiest and intuitive to use, that lets me do what I want. I view software-through-iTunes as a big advantage, to get clean, safe, well-integrated software in an easy method.

I don't want to write my own programming, but to have people who are better than I am doing it, and making many other product decisions. Then all I have to do is choose the best...which since my first 128k Mac in 1984...is Apple products. Better design, less hassles, more reliable.

With Generous Support From...