2

Oh no she didn't! Advice on 'Working with Bitches'

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player
Image of Working with Bitches: Identify the Eight Types of Office Mean Girls and Rise Above Workplace Nastiness
Author: Meredith Fuller
Publisher: Da Capo Lifelong Books (2013)
Binding: Paperback, 272 pages

Dominance displays, posturing, submissive behavior -- sound like anything you've seen at the office? Psychologist Meredith Fuller specializes in a certain subset of these behaviors -- usually exhibited by women -- behaviors we all know rather well. Cattiness. Dismissive, snide remarks. Cliques and talking behind people's backs. Most of us associate this kind of stuff with high school, but it doesn't end there.  It can make your life miserable at work. Fuller's written a new book about this with the eye-catching title of "Working with Bitches."

Fuller says she chose to use the word "bitch" in her book title for two reasons. First, everybody knows what you mean when you say 'I work with a bitch.' And second, the "new bitch" is fun and can be a positive thing. She says there's nothing wrong with a woman who is assertive and tough in the workplace, but she wrote her book for more polite, concerned, earnest women who need a way to deal with the sort of behaviors that are more manipulative and cunning.

Fuller identifies eight different types of so-called office mean girls at work (find out about the different types of bitches and what you can do about them by clicking on the photo above).  She says low self-esteem is the reason some women engage in these devious behaviors.

"For a lot of us, we've got fears, anxieties, depressions, worries and we mask that. So a lot of the bitchy behavior is because [bitches] don't know how to feel good enough and so they're relying on these covert behaviors. But there's always something they want. For example, that micro-managing boss who's always saying this isn't good enough, do it again, slashing with a red pen -- often it's their anxiety and they feel they're going to mess up. They look at you and if you're not very neat, that just screams terror for them that something will go wrong. And they're worried that they're not in control. The more they feel in control, the less they have to hassle you," says Fuller. "So give them those updates before they ask, make your desk look neat every time they go back. That helps bring down their anxiety. It's working at what is driving their behavior underneath what they're showing you and try and resolve that for them so they don't need to have that unconscious nastiness triggered."

Men also exhibit alienating behaviors -- like lying, narcissism or exclusion. But they are much more overt than women. To some men, engaging in manipulative behavior can almost seem like a game.

"We all engage in behavior to get a need met, but often what you notice is that it's more subtle with women. It's harder to read them," says Fuller. "Women are more selective and are more able to play it so subtly with several mutterings and nonverbal behavior that a lot of the men don't necessarily engage in. It's more like it is what it is with a lot of men."

Part of the issue with some women in the workplace is they have a desire to be liked whereas men are more likely to want to be feared at work.

"We've got mixed motivations [at work] and I think that's what we pick up. What we've noticed is that historically women have felt they need to be more sly, surreptitious, cunning, manipulative and that's what they've been rewarded for," says Fuller. "What I really like, a lot of the young people we're getting through -- the more Gen Y's -- they're actually saying, 'Oh blow all of this. Let me be who I am and part of me is a range of behaviors.' And that also allows men to have their range of behaviors."

Fuller says she's starting to see a massive paradigm shift where a lot of the old, rigid structures are beginning to be broken down. But we're still in a period where bitchy behavior is something some workers have to cope with.

About the author

In more than 20 years in public radio, Barbara Bogaev has served as the longtime guest host of NPR’s flagship program Fresh Air with Terry Gross, as well as host of APM’s news and culture magazine, Weekend America and the weekly national documentary series, Soundprint.
WomenWhoRunIt's picture
WomenWhoRunIt - Apr 7, 2013

Go ahead – call me BITCH...
Really!
Why do we think it is such a derogatory term to all women? (And no, I am not a GenYer - I am in fact as Jane Fonda says, coming into my "Third Act" and loving it. )

If you can embrace your own “bitchiness” then no one can use it against you. Roll with the punches. I am frequently heard quoting “Yes, I AM a Babe in Total Control of Herself (ie. a B.I.T.C.H.)”. It usually gets a chuckle if nothing else and laughter is a good equalizer and diffuses tensions.

My rant is to ‘get over it’!
Own it!
Embrace it!
Being a BITCH (aka Beautiful, Intelligent, Charming, & Hellacious) is what gets me up in the morning and I would love to have the company of others...

Still I have to get Meredith's book and check it out but thanks Barbara for bringing it to my attention.

Fiona Fine
Editor-In-Chief
http://WomenWhoRunIt.com

azure15's picture
azure15 - Apr 6, 2013

Amazing how I read of "mean girls" but never of "mean boys" at least, not when the writer is actually discussing adult men.

As for those wonderful Gen "Y"s, is the writer or the psychologist stating that Gen Y males engage in work behaviors that are "surreptitious, sly, cunning," etc., as adult women (very scientifically described as "bitches") apparently currently engage in? And will they be described with the same or similar adjectives?

And why isn't there a similar kind of description for nasty & abuse "mean boy" bosses? Something other than bastard (which is really just criticising someone's mother for having a child out of wedlock). Where's that Gen Y creativity?

Nothing like institutionalizing misogyny & sexism.

It would've been just as easy and make more sense, to describe women's behavior as more subtle, or a much more delicate and careful manipulation of the work situation. Or even a more hidden destructive use of authority. Instead, only unfavorable adjectives were used, while abusive male boss behavior was described as: it is what it is. I sure hope women employees who've been subjected to sexual/physical harassment, lower wages for the same work, feel that way and no doubt feel much better knowing that what they had to deal with "simple/direct" harassment rather than something simple.

In addition, I had a friend who's worked for large corporations all of her career (30+ years). The most egregious abusive work behavior she described to me was performed by a WOMAN supervisor. That woman, in meetings, would openly make fun of a subordinate who stammers. And btw, none of the other subordinates did anything (male or female) because they didn't want the woman to turn her (abusive) attention on them. I fail to see how this behavior was sly or surreptitious, it sound pretty openly & directly abusive to me and it's not the first openly & directly abusive adult female (or male) behavior I've heard of or observed in a work place.

But my main criticism of this article is that it replicates a long standing tendency to characterize a woman's behavior in far more critical terms then similar male behavior is and that it continues to apply more critical nouns & adjectives to describe undesireable female then male behavior (and to consider a much greater range of female then male behavior to be undesireable). Just read a few books about male employee/boss behavior in some investment banks, in Mike Milliken's business, etc.