3

Next up on the sequester tarmac? Corporate jets

The Federal Aviation Administration has identified dozens of airfields that could be closed, many of which are regularly used by business travelers and executives.

Now that those automatic spending cuts have kicked in, bureaucrats are taking a close look at their budgets -- finding ways to cut back and save money. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has told 238 small airports that, in a couple of months, the agency could close their control towers. That could hinder the military, pilots in training, and yes, the so-called “one percent” with their private jets. 

Last night, the transportation director in Battle Creek, Mich., Larry Bowron, got an e-mail from the FAA, it read: “We regret to inform you that, in order to implement the budget sequestration that went into effect March 1, 2013, the FAA must make some critical decisions about funding.”

It went on to say that Bowron’s airport could lose its control tower. Battle Creek is home to cereal maker Kellogg's. Bowron says its executives use the airport. Company representatives weren’t available for comment.

No commercial carrier serves the airport, but according to Bowron, it’s busy.

“You can have corporate jets coming in,” he says. “You can have military airplanes coming in. It equates to a very complex operating environment.”

I heard the same thing from Mark Nelson, the air traffic manager at the Sacramento Executive Airport, where Nelson estimates, 270 aircraft take off and land every day. 

“Who is going to make the call on who turns where, and who turns when?”

That would be up to pilots themselves to decide. Even without the towers, planes would still be able to fly in and out. 

But Melissa Rudinger, with the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, says these airports wouldn’t be as safe or efficient.

“There are corporations and businesses that take advantage of operating in and out of these smaller airports," she says.

Larry Bowron says he’d like to tell the FAA about his airport’s importance to Battle Creek, but... He goes back to that e-mail.

“The FAA is unable to consider local community impact that does not affect the national interest.”

About the author

David Gura is a reporter for Marketplace, based in the Washington, D.C. bureau.
Log in to post3 Comments

So we will not pay for the convenience of corporate jets anymore for Kellogg's?
Their profit was $300 million in 3Q 2012.
There is something wrong with this?
Never would have happened without sequester.

FAA’s share of the sequester is $600M? That is less than 4% of their expected INCREASE in spending for the year. Closing 238 control towers averages just over $2.5M/tower. So we’re paying $200,000 per employee at these towers?

FAA’s share of the sequester is $600M out of a $46.27B annual budget. That is less than a 1.3% decrease.

The FAA is allocating the entire sequester to 238 control towers? Is that a political decision? That is at the direction of the President.

The President wants to use the sequester to inflict as much pain, discomfort, inconvenience and outrage possible because he doesn’t want to do anything fiscally responsible like reduce spending.

You are his useful idiots for not investigating what’s really going on here.

How about the concept that corporate executives with private jets pay their fair share in taxes, so that the government has to cut FAA jobs and shut down control towers?.....funny how republicans (most corporate executives are) are ok with spending cuts, until they are affected by those cuts...

With Generous Support From...