25

Freakonomics: Should we pay for our trash?

Overflowing trash bins

To view this content, Javascript must be enabled and Adobe Flash Player must be installed.

Get Adobe Flash player

TEXT OF INTERVIEW

KAI RYSSDAL: It's that time now for a little Freakonomics Radio. It's that moment every couple of weeks where we talk to Stephen Dubner, the co-author of the books and the blog of the same name. It is about the hidden side of everything. Dubner, always good to have you back.

STEPHEN DUBNER: There is no place I'd rather be.

RYSSDAL: All right, I don't believe that. But anyway, so I was in New York a while ago, a couple of months ago, came by your apartment, and you had me do this thing that was actually rather disgusting. Let's roll some tape here.

RYSSDAL: All right. I have brought my latex gloves. So this won't hurt a bit. Let's go out and look at your trash. We have flowers. We have...

DUBNER: Those were my wife's...

RYSSDAL: OK. I'm sorry. Seriously, on the top of the recycling thing is a little Dewars Scotch, White Label.

DUBNER: Now aren't you glad at least I recycle? But Kai, don't you think we should at explain to the people why you were actually going through my trash here?

RYSSDAL: We should. We had some time to kill on the Upper West Side of Manhattan and... No, no. You had this thing about trash and the economics thereof, right?

DUBNER: Guilty as charged. Here's the thing. Trash is a gorgeous illustration of what you call the free-rider problem. A lot of us just take our trash for granted. We stick it out on the curb -- voila, it disappears.

RYSSDAL: Except we pay for it, right? It's either in our property taxes or it's in our water bills. I mean, it's not like it's free free.

DUBNER: Right. It's not free free, but the fee is hidden. And moreover the fee is a flat fee, which means I get to throw away as much trash as I want. So why bother to produce less? If my electricity bill were a flat fee every month, I would never turn off a single light in my house. Listen to Lisa Skumatz, she's an economist at a consulting firm that helps cities deal with their trash.

LISA SKUMATZ: Makes me think about an all-you-can-eat buffet. As in, all-you-can-throw-out trash with no incentives for people to think about the cost of what they're doing.

Now for 25 years, Skumatz has been working with a model called "Pay-as-you-throw," which forces people to put their money where their trash it.

RYSSDAL: Yeah, they have it actually here in parts of L.A. It's the more you put on the curb, basically, the more you pay.

DUBNER: So you're kind of at the center of the boom and it has been a big boom. A few years ago, 20 years ago, you go back, fewer than 200 places in the U.S. had "Pay-as-you-throw." Now we're up to about 7,000 or about a quarter of the country. So a trash consultant like Lisa Skumatz, she loves it. Now that people are paying for what they toss, their behavior changes. And here's the best part: If you're in government, "Pay-as-you-throw" makes it easy for you to start billing directly people for trash pick-up. So bingo, new revenue streams. Sounds pretty win-win, right?

RYSSDAL: Yeah, if you're in the mood of giving the government your money. But OK, go ahead.

DUBNER: Exactly. Some people, as you could intuit, are a little bit less than thrilled by it.

MARK GREEN: Oh yeah, I'm sure there are effigies of me hanging from numerous places in people's houses.

That's Mark Green, who's the town manager of Sanford, Maine. Sanford introduced "Pay-as-you-throw" last July. People had to pay $2 for every big purple, "Pay-as-you-throw" bag of trash. It worked great. Trash volume was cut in half. But some people there in Sanford, like Len Mustacchio, they thought the idea stank.

LEN MUSTACCHIO: Anything that's a fee, might as well be a tax. It's one and the same. You don't have a choice. Although they'll tell you, 'You do have a choice, you can throw out less garbage.' Well what am I supposed to do? Eat it?

So in November, the voters in Sanford repealed "Pay-as-you-throw."

RYSSDAL: Yeah, so Dubner, get me to the hidden side of this. I mean, incentives matter, right? If you tax, essentially trash, what happens?

DUBNER: Well, you've got to understand, incentives matter. And the people who design them think they know how people are going to respond to them. But the fact is, they don't. You introduce an incentive and people respond to it in a way that benefits them. So with the trash tax, yes. A lot of people might pay dutifully. Some towns like Sanford, Maine, might repeal their tax. And other places, they'll do things like in Ireland, there was a spike in emergency room visits for burn victims because a lot of people started burning trash in their backyard to avoid the new tax. This is kind of where economics and psychology hook up. If you're accustomed to getting something for free, and then you're asked to pay for it -- even if it's just a couple of bucks -- you might get really unhappy. Like if all of a sudden, I started charging you, Kai, a dollar every time you said the word "Freakonomics" on the radio.

RYSSDAL: OK. So you know what, you actually wouldn't be on the radio very much. That's actually what would happen. But we will bring you back again in a couple of weeks. That's Stephen Dubner, "Freakonomics Radio."

DUBNER: One dollar right there. One dollar right there.

RYSSDAL: I know, right? FreakonomicsRadio.com is his website. Two dollars. See you in a couple of weeks.

DUBNER: My pleasure, Kai. Thanks.

Pages

Shaunna Sutcliffe's picture
Shaunna Sutcliffe - Jan 18, 2011

I live in Portland Oregon where I help businesses reduce waste for a living. The less trash we produce here in Oregon the less we pay in our trash bill. Its simple; businesses and homes are cutting back on every utility bill and saving, garbage included. The key here is we recieve a garbage bill, instead of a tax we never equate to garbage service. If the taxes could be cut by $19 per month and a $19 monthly bill sent to the tax payer instead, we may hear little protest.

David Boyes's picture
David Boyes - Jan 13, 2011

One way to ease the pain (this is done frequently in Europe) is to mandate that retailers accept excess packaging and incorporate it into THEIR trash bill, ie, if you buy something at a store, they have to allow you to dump any of the packaging in THEIR trash bins and THEY pay for hauling it off. This leads immediately to retailers FORCING suppliers to cut down on unnecessary packaging and use only what they really need, dramatically reducing the personal trash amounts required. I saw this work with a lot of American expats when I lived in Germany (where the trash collection is billed by the kilogram, and it's EXPENSIVE). You learn *really* fast to strip everything you can out in the grocery store and use reusable bags and containers.

Doug Key's picture
Doug Key - Jan 13, 2011

What people fail to realize is the cost of trash disposal. A waste company has to buy a truck which cost anywhere from $180k for a recycling truck to $300k for an automated residential truck. Factor in the cost of the employees to drive the truck, throw the trash, take care of routing, billing, customer service, etc. Then the landfill expense gets added in. There are so many regulations for dumping trash. It costs millions to prepare a cell for trash. Methane and leachate retentions systems must be built into the cell. Landfill equipment costs are nothing to sneeze at. A compactor can cost anywhere from $700k to one million dollars. Most landfills need two or three. Add bulldozer, excavators, backhoes, tippers, truck washers, scales, and then people to operate all these things. Where is the "free" in trash? Or recycling, for that matter? People need to take responsibility for the trash that they generate and the waste they so glibly dismiss as someone elses' problem. It is your problem.

Jared Van Leeuwen's picture
Jared Van Leeuwen - Jan 12, 2011

A pay as you throw program would have to be introduced with a reduction in other fees/bills. I could see most people complaining though that such a service would benifit the wealthy who could afford to throw away trash and punish the poor who wouldn't be able to throw it away. A socialist system where the rich pay for the service that everyone uses would be the fairest.

Dixie Sommers's picture
Dixie Sommers - Jan 12, 2011

I used to live in Upper Arlington, Ohio, which has "pay to throw" known as the Trash Sticker Program. This works pretty well - you pay per bag to have the trash picked up, but recycling pick up is free. As you can see from the city's web site, they are raising the fee since the "residents' output of refuse has declined" while land fill fees have increased and recycling income is hurt by the market conditions for newspaper. Where I live now doesn't have such a program. I miss it.

Upper Arlington, Ohio http://www.uaoh.net/publicservices/index.php?fDD=47-0

suzanne new's picture
suzanne new - Jan 12, 2011

the concept of "pay as you throw" out your trash does not really make economic sense. big fan of freakonomics, but people need to take into account how much garbage will be thrown to the side of roads rather than pay as they go -- the ost of "litter" / storm drains versus the cost of garbage pick-up ... anyone who has adopted a highway in this country KNOWS this already happens and is a big expense to states, counties, etc...

Kelli Hix's picture
Kelli Hix - Jan 12, 2011

Have any communities tried positive, rather than negative reinforcement on this issue? In states with glass bottle returns, positive reinforcement seems to work very well. For instance, why not provide a a tax break to those who produce a limited amount of trash?

Alison Williams Helm's picture
Alison Williams Helm - Jan 12, 2011

The city of Portland, ME also has a pay as you throw program where the trash service will only pick up trash in special bags--that are more expensive than regular trash bags at the grocery store. I think the program has been successful (less trash overall) except that large items end up just sort of sitting around in yards, the backs of houses, parking lots, sides of roads, etc. Also there is a problem with illegal dumping by people who don't want to buy the more expensive special trash bags.

Jim M'Ski's picture
Jim M'Ski - Jan 12, 2011

I return my trash where I shop - on my return visit (its their problem). Thats were I bought it.

Stephan Goetschius's picture
Stephan Goetschius - Jan 12, 2011

It may be all fine, well and good to tax the consumers as one touchpoint in the flow of waste. But where is the discussion on taxing the producers of such waste? Creating incentives at the source has shown more powerful promise.

Pages