Support our non-partisan non-profit newsroom 💜 Donate now

King v. Burwell: Oral arguments on Obamacare

Kai Ryssdal and Dan Gorenstein Mar 4, 2015
HTML EMBED:
COPY

King v. Burwell: Oral arguments on Obamacare

Kai Ryssdal and Dan Gorenstein Mar 4, 2015
HTML EMBED:
COPY

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case known as King v. Burwell, a challenge to the subsidies included in the Affordable Care Act — or Obamacare, as some may call it.

Marketplace’s Dan Gorenstein was in the Supreme Court Chamber Wednesday morning for arguments. He says, one of the big takeaways from the hearing was that the justices all seemed to get it.

“While they spent 84 minutes debating legal theory, the most vocal justices on the left and the right spoke to the potential real world impact,” says Gorenstein. “We’re talking about millions of Americans potentially losing their insurance.”

Both Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Samuel Alito, in a way, offered some sorts of contingency plans.

“Scalia talked about Congress coming up with a solution if these subsidies go away,” says Gorenstein. “Alito mentioned that the subsidies wouldn’t have to be eliminated immediately, potentially buying Congress some time.”

There’s a lot happening in the world.  Through it all, Marketplace is here for you. 

You rely on Marketplace to break down the world’s events and tell you how it affects you in a fact-based, approachable way. We rely on your financial support to keep making that possible. 

Your donation today powers the independent journalism that you rely on. For just $5/month, you can help sustain Marketplace so we can keep reporting on the things that matter to you.